Trailer Hitch and Steering Layout for Stable Backing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing trailers face challenges with maneuverability, stability, and manufacturing inefficiencies, particularly when carrying heavy loads, due to unrestricted rotational axes, unreliable actuator systems, and costly, complex components.

Innovation Solution

A trailer design with a hitch assembly that limits vertical pivot axis, incorporates a shock-absorbing system, uses a servo electric actuator for smooth transitions, and employs CNC-manufactured spindle blocks and tie rods for precise alignment, along with a trailing link caster steering system to minimize tire wear and enhance stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a ball shaped hitch is used to allow relative motion between towing vehicle and trailer, then maneuvering freedom is improved, but backing control deteriorates due to unrestricted rotation in three axes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuvering freedomVSAvoidbacking control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The hitch assembly is segmented into three independent rotational axes (vertical pivot axis, longitudinal roll axis, and lateral pitch axis), each controlled separately. This segmentation allows the trailer to maintain freedom of motion while enabling precise control during backing operations by selectively restraining specific axes as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hitch assembly dynamically transitions between different operational states: during normal towing it allows free rotation in all three axes for maneuvering freedom, while during backing operations it can restrain the vertical pivot axis to provide directional control. This dynamic adaptability resolves the contradiction between freedom and control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the vertical pivot axis is restrained to enable direct following behind the towing vehicle, then backing control is improved, but maneuvering freedom deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebacking controlVSAvoidmaneuvering freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The vertical pivot axis restraint mechanism dynamically engages only when needed for backing control, while disengaging during normal maneuvering operations. This dynamic control allows the system to provide direct following behavior during backing while maintaining full maneuvering freedom during other operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The hitch assembly includes automatic engagement and disengagement mechanisms that activate the vertical pivot axis restraint based on operational conditions, eliminating the need for manual intervention and providing seamless transition between controlled and free maneuvering modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Extent of automation

If electro-hydraulic actuator system is used for transitioning between forward and reverse operation, then automation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to leakage and malfunction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition automationVSAvoidactuator reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The electro-hydraulic actuator system is replaced with a purely mechanical actuator system that uses mechanical advantage through linkages and levers to achieve transitions between forward and reverse operations. This eliminates hydraulic fluid and associated leakage problems while maintaining automated transition capability through mechanical self-latching mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical actuator system uses simple, robust components that are easier to manufacture and replace than electro-hydraulic actuators. While the individual components may have shorter service lives, their simplicity and low cost make them more reliable in practice due to fewer failure modes and easier maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Adaptability or versatility

If original hitch assembly design is used, then three-axis rotation freedom is achieved, but structural strength deteriorates due to bolt shearing under shear force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotational freedomVSAvoidhitch assembly strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The hitch assembly is divided into separate functional components for each rotational axis, with independent mounting and load-bearing structures. This segmentation distributes shear forces across multiple specialized joints rather than concentrating them in single bolts, maintaining rotational freedom while improving overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hitch assembly incorporates composite construction with reinforced mounting points and distributed load paths using multiple materials and structural configurations. This composite approach maintains the required rotational freedom while significantly increasing resistance to shear forces that caused bolt failure in the original design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

5Length of stationary object

If trailer frame is positioned low relative to the street, then ground clearance is reduced, but stability deteriorates due to uncontrolled bouncing at high speeds

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe heightVSAvoidhigh-speed stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of stationary objectVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The shock-absorbing system is pre-configured with springs and dampers positioned to engage before excessive bouncing occurs at high speeds. This beforehand cushioning provides controlled resistance to vertical motion, maintaining stability while allowing the frame to remain positioned low relative to the street for improved ground clearance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The shock-absorbing system dynamically adjusts its damping parameters based on vehicle speed and road conditions, providing softer suspension at low speeds for comfort and stiffer damping at high speeds for stability. This parameter adjustment allows the low frame position to be maintained without sacrificing high-speed stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enables easy parking and reversing, reduces tire wear, improves stability, and lowers production costs through efficient manufacturing methods, ensuring reliable operation and ease of use.

Implementation Method 1

incorporates a shock-absorbing system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 2

uses a servo electric actuator for smooth transitions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectServo electric actuation: Linear Motor

Data Source

PatentUS20250360980A1Trailer
Publication Date: 2025.11.27 LUCIA INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US20250360980A1 patent drawing
  • US20250360980A1 patent drawing
  • US20250360980A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An improved trailer construction can have a forward locking configuration while still permitting selective tie rod pivoting of forward and rear tie rods in forward and rearward configurations. A shock assembly may assist in coupling a hitch assembly to a trailer frame to assist in keeping wheels of the trailer on the ground. Also, by providing an improved trailer frame, a lower aspect can be achieved than in prior art constructions.