Trailing-Rotor Fixed Wing Layout for Stall Recovery Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft designs, particularly those with tilt rotors, fail to efficiently transition between hover and cruise positions, leading to instability and control issues during stall out, and existing aircraft designs have tilt wings, fail to efficiently transition between cruise position and hover position, leading to instability and control issues during stall out.

Innovation Solution

Aircraft with a forward swept and fixed wing, equipped with trailing edge mounted tilt rotors and a T-tail configuration, which maintains control and stability during stall out by utilizing a canard and T-tail configuration, enhancing stability and control during high-speed flight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If tilt rotors are mounted on the trailing edge of a fixed wing, then the aircraft can transition between hover and cruise positions, but the aircraft experiences instability and control issues during stall out

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransition capability between hover and cruiseVSAvoidstability during stall out
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The horizontal tail is divided into two separate surfaces: a conventional horizontal stabilizer and a T-tail horizontal stabilizer. This segmentation allows each surface to perform specific functions during different flight phases, with the T-tail providing dedicated stall recovery control independent of the main wing and canard

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The T-tail configuration positions the horizontal stabilizer in a higher vertical dimension, above the rotor downwash region. This spatial repositioning allows the tail to maintain aerodynamic effectiveness during hover and transition phases when it would otherwise be obscured by rotor wake turbulence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If a conventional horizontal tail is used, then the structure is simpler, but the aircraft loses control authority during deep stall conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetail configuration complexityVSAvoidcontrol authority during deep stall
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The T-tail horizontal stabilizer acts as an intermediary control surface that can independently generate pitching moments to recover from deep stall conditions. When the canard and main wing are stalled and unresponsive, the T-tail provides a direct aerodynamic lever arm to restore controlled flight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The asymmetric placement of the T-tail above the rotor disk creates differential aerodynamic effects during various flight phases. During hover, the tail operates in clean airflow above the downwash, while during forward flight, it provides enhanced stall recovery authority through its elevated position

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

3Volume of moving object

If the horizontal tail is positioned low, then the structure is more compact, but the tail enters the rotor wake and loses effectiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft compactnessVSAvoidtail effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The horizontal tail is repositioned from the lateral dimension (low vs high placement) to the vertical dimension (above the rotor disk). This dimensional change allows the tail to escape the rotor wake region while maintaining structural integration with the fuselage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The configuration improves stability and control during stall out and high-speed flight, allowing for safer and more efficient transitions between vertical takeoff and landing, and forward flight, with reduced drag and increased flight range.

Implementation Method 1

The horizontal tail surfaces are positioned above the rotor wake to improve stability and control during stall out

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic wake: Turbulence

Implementation Method 2

if some or all of the horizontal lift surfaces of the aircraft were to stall out

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFlow separation: Flow Separation

Implementation Method 3

Aircraft with a forward swept and fixed wing, equipped with trailing edge mounted tilt rotors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic lift: Aerofoil

Implementation Method 4

trailing edge mounted tilt rotors and a T-tail configuration, which maintains control and stability during stall out

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThrust: Jet

Data Source

PatentUS12515792B2Fixed wing aircraft with trailing rotors and T-tail
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 KITTY HAWK CORP
  • US12515792B2 patent drawing
  • US12515792B2 patent drawing
  • US12515792B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft that includes a canard having a leading edge and a trailing edge, a forward swept and fixed wing having a trailing edge, and a plurality of tilt rotor submodules, a dovetail, and a T-tail. The plurality of tilt rotor submodules are coupled to the trailing edge of the forward swept and fixed wing. The dovetail is attached to an underside of a fuselage. The T-tail is located above the dovetail. A horizontal plane of the T-tail is at a height that is higher than a horizonal plane of the forward swept and fixed wing.