Train Bellows Coupling With Integrated Crash Absorption

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing train coach coupling systems are complex, space-consuming, and heavy due to the integration of mechanical couplers and gangways, which impose kinematic constraints and increase weight, while also complicating integration with coach bodies.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising bellows with integrated latching mechanisms and shock absorbers that replace traditional mechanical couplers, providing frictional connections, weather protection, and shock absorption, while allowing for data and power transfer between coaches.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional mechanical couplers and gangways are integrated into coach coupling systems, then mechanical connection and passenger access are provided, but system complexity, weight, and space consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical connection reliabilityVSAvoidcoupling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the mechanical coupling function and the protective enclosure (gangway) into a single integrated bellows structure. The bellows serves both as the mechanical connector between coaches and as the protective housing for the coupling mechanism, eliminating the need for separate gangway structures and reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The bellows structure performs multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical coupling between coaches, protects the coupling mechanism, allows for relative movement between coaches, and provides a housing for the latching mechanism. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed in the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If traditional mechanical couplers are used, then mechanical coupling is achieved, but weight of each coach increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling reliabilityVSAvoidcoach weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical coupler functionality is merged into the bellows structure itself, which is a flexible protective enclosure. This integration eliminates the need for heavy separate mechanical coupler assemblies, reducing the overall weight while maintaining coupling reliability through the bellows' inherent mechanical properties.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If separate mechanical coupler and gangway systems are integrated, then coupling functionality is provided, but integration complexity with coach bodies increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling functionalityVSAvoidintegration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The bellows structure integrates the mechanical coupling function and the protective enclosure into a single component that can be directly mounted to the coach body. This eliminates the need for complex integration of multiple separate systems (coupler, gangway, mounting structures), simplifying both manufacturing and installation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Reliability

If frictional connection is provided through latching mechanism, then coupling stability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling stabilityVSAvoidlatching mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The latching mechanism is designed to automatically engage and disengage the bellows with the coach body through frictional contact. The system uses the natural friction between mating surfaces to maintain coupling stability without requiring complex active locking mechanisms, motors, or sensors, thereby maintaining reliability while minimizing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Reduces system complexity, weight, and maintenance costs, enhances kinematics, and provides effective crash protection up to 40 km/h, with reduced space requirements and improved integration with coach bodies.

Implementation Method 1

the first bellows provides protection of an object moving via a bridge from the first coach to the second coach

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhysical Containment: Physical Containment

Implementation Method 2

The first latching mechanism according to the present invention provides at least a frictional connection or a positive fit of the first coupling frame to the second coupling frame

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 3

the first reversible shock absorber is arranged and located to absorb the compressive force, once the compressive force exceeds a lower force threshold value

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShock absorption: Damping

Implementation Method 4

the first non-reversible shock reducing element is arranged and located to absorb the compressive force by creating a structural plastic deformation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlastic deformation: Plasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4644207A1A system for coupling a first coach to a second coach of a train
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 HUBNER GMBH
  • EP4644207A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4644207A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4644207A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for coupling a first coach of a train to a second coach of the train, the system comprising a first bellows, wherein the first bellows provides protection of a passenger or an object moving via a bridge from the first coach to the second coach, wherein the first bellows comprises a first mounting frame and a first coupling frame (8), wherein the first mounting frame (9) is fixable to an end wall of a first body of the first coach; a first latching mechanism at the first coupling frame (8), wherein the first coupling frame (8) is releasably couplable by the first latching mechanism to a second receptacle at a second coupling frame (8) of a second bellows at the second coach; a first receptacle at the first coupling frame (8), wherein the first coupling frame (8) is releasably couplable by the first receptacle to a second latching mechanism at the second coupling frame (108); wherein the first latching mechanism and the first receptacle are arranged to transfer a tensile force acting between the first body of the first coach and a second body of the second coach during operation of the train; a first reversible shock absorber, wherein the first reversible shock absorber is arranged and located to transfer the tensile force and a compressive force between the first mounting frame (9) and the first coupling frame (8), and wherein the first reversible shock absorber is arranged and located to absorb the compressive force, once the compressive force exceeds a lower force threshold value; and a first non-reversible shock reducing element, wherein the first non-reversible shock reducing element is arranged and located to transfer the tensile force and the compressive force between the first mounting frame (9) and the first coupling frame (8), and wherein the first non-reversible shock reducing element is arranged and located to absorb the compressive force by creating a structural plastic deformation of at least a part of the first non-reversible shock reducing element, once the compressive force exceeds an upper force threshold value, wherein the upper force threshold value is larger than the lower threshold value.