Train Brake Pipe Air Propagation Rate Determination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current pneumatically-controlled train braking systems face challenges in accurately determining air propagation rate, leading to uncertainties in braking performance and potential undesired emergency brake applications due to faulty brake valves, which can impact train safety and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for determining air propagation rate through a pneumatically-controlled braking arrangement, involving lead and rear devices that associate time and air pressure data to calculate air propagation data, allowing for accurate predictive braking algorithms and identifying faulty brake valves.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a conservative constant propagation rate is used to account for extremes in temperature, pressure, and humidity, then braking safety is maintained under all conditions, but predictive braking accuracy deteriorates due to uncertainty in stopping distance predictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking safetyVSAvoidstopping distance prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the propagation rate parameter from a fixed conservative constant to a variable value based on actual measured conditions (temperature, pressure, humidity, train configuration). This allows the system to adapt to different environmental conditions while maintaining safety margins, thereby improving prediction accuracy without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously measuring actual air propagation rates under various conditions and using this data to refine predictive braking algorithms. The measured propagation rates feed back into the control system to adjust stopping distance predictions in real-time, eliminating the need for overly conservative constants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If actual air propagation rate is measured to improve predictive braking algorithms, then stopping distance prediction accuracy improves, but system complexity increases due to additional sensors and data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopping distance prediction accuracyVSAvoidmeasurement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses existing brake pipe infrastructure and integrated sensors already present in modern trains to measure air propagation rates. Rather than adding dedicated measurement equipment, the system repurposes existing components (pressure sensors, timing systems) to gather propagation data, thereby reducing additional complexity while achieving accurate measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement system serves multiple functions: it monitors brake pipe pressure, tracks air propagation rates, detects faulty brake valves, and provides data for predictive braking algorithms. By making the measurement system multi-functional, the patent avoids the need for separate dedicated measurement equipment, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If brake pipe pressure is reduced to signal braking force to railcars, then braking control is achieved, but undesired emergency brake applications may occur due to faulty brake valves

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebraking controlVSAvoidbrake application accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by monitoring air propagation rates from multiple points in the train. When a faulty brake valve causes abnormal pressure changes or propagation delays, the system detects these anomalies and can isolate or compensate for the defective component, preventing false emergency brake applications while maintaining reliable braking control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system takes preliminary anti-action by continuously monitoring brake valve performance and detecting potential faults before they cause undesired emergency applications. By identifying defective brake valves through abnormal propagation patterns, the system can take corrective action (such as isolating the faulty valve) before it triggers a false emergency brake signal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables precise determination of air propagation rate for improved predictive braking, reducing uncertainties in braking performance and identifying faulty brake valves to prevent undesired emergency applications, enhancing train safety and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

the propagation time for air to travel from the lead locomotive to the end-of-train (or rear railcar) through the brake pipe should be determined

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir propagation: Speed of Sound

Implementation Method 2

Reducing the pressure in the brake pipe is a signal to the brake valves on each car for controlling braking force at each railcar

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure reduction signaling: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS9403517B2System and method for determining air propagation data in a braking arrangement of a train
Publication Date: 2016.08.02 WABTEC HLDG CORP
  • US9403517B2 patent drawing
  • US9403517B2 patent drawing
  • US9403517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for determining air propagation rate through a pneumatically-controlled braking arrangement of a train, the braking arrangement having a controller for adjusting air pressure of air transmitted through a brake pipe from a lead locomotive to a rear railcar, the system including: a lead device positioned on the lead locomotive and configured to associate first time data with first air pressure data sensed in the brake pipe at a first position; a rear device positioned on the rear railcar and configured to associate second time data with second air pressure data sensed in the brake pipe at a second position; and a control device configured to determine air propagation data based at least partially upon at least one of the following: first time data, first air pressure data, the first position, second time data, second air pressure data, the second position, or any combination thereof.