Train Control System Dynamic Feature Condition Identification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current train control systems lack effective methods for accurately identifying and communicating the condition of safety devices and equipment at railroad crossings, leading to potential safety risks due to inadequate data dissemination and reliance on manual flagging arrangements.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a positioning system and database to dynamically update and communicate track and feature data, including safety device status, to train operators and central dispatch, enabling real-time identification of conditions and automatic adjustments in train operation, such as speed restriction or braking, based on the status of primary and secondary safety measures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual flagging arrangements are used to protect railroad crossings, then safety can be maintained with minimal equipment, but the complexity of the system increases and reliability decreases due to human error and equipment failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety protection reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the operational status of safety devices at railroad crossings and provides real-time feedback to train operators via the train control system. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adjustment of train operations based on the monitored conditions, improving reliability while reducing the need for complex manual flagging arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The safety monitoring system operates autonomously by automatically detecting the status of safety devices and initiating appropriate train control actions without requiring manual intervention. The system self-manages the safety protection process, eliminating the need for complex human-operated flagging arrangements while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If real-time monitoring of safety device status is implemented, then train operation safety improves, but the loss of information decreases due to better data dissemination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain operation safetyVSAvoidsafety data dissemination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system establishes a continuous feedback loop where safety device status is monitored and immediately communicated to train operators through the train control system. This real-time feedback eliminates information loss by ensuring that operators are always aware of the current safety conditions, enabling timely and accurate train control decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The train control system serves as an intermediary between the safety monitoring equipment and the train operator. This intermediary efficiently transmits safety status information to the operator, preventing information loss and ensuring that critical safety data is disseminated accurately and timely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automatic train control adjustments are made based on safety device status, then productivity increases by reducing manual intervention, but the device complexity increases due to automated systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrain operation efficiencyVSAvoidautomated control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated train control system performs safety-related operations autonomously by monitoring safety device status and automatically adjusting train operations as needed. This self-service capability improves productivity by eliminating manual intervention while the modular design of the system manages complexity through standardized safety protocols and integrated control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The train control system is designed as a multi-functional platform that handles both monitoring and control operations through integrated components. This universal design allows the system to perform multiple safety-related functions without requiring separate complex systems, thereby improving productivity while managing overall system complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8175764B2System and method for identifying a condition of an upcoming feature in a track network
Publication Date: 2012.05.08 WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECH CORP
  • US8175764B2 patent drawing
  • US8175764B2 patent drawing
  • US8175764B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for identifying at least one condition of at least one upcoming feature of at least one track in a track network. The system includes a positioning system for determining an estimated train position on a track within the track network, and at least one database including track data and feature data. A computer (i) obtains the determined estimated train position on at least one track from the positioning system; and (ii) for the at least one track, identifies at least one condition for at least one upcoming feature based at least in part upon the track data and the feature data in the at least one database. The feature data is dynamically updated while the train is traversing the track in the track network. A method and apparatus for identifying a condition of an upcoming feature are also provided.