Train Control System Dynamic Resource Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing train control systems face challenges in managing route resources efficiently, leading to operational inefficiencies, deadlocks, and increased risk of conflicts due to concurrent train operations, which limits transport capacity and safety.

Innovation Solution

A train control system and method utilizing a dispatching center server, trackside resource manager, and vehicle-mounted train control device to manage and allocate route resources dynamically, ensuring safe positioning and communication between trains, and implementing conflict and sequencing management to optimize resource use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional route-based resource management is used, then system reliability is maintained through exclusive resource allocation, but route passing-through capacity is limited due to resource idle time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute passing-through capacityVSAvoidoperation safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic resource allocation by allowing route resources to transition between exclusive and shared states based on real-time train positions and operational conditions. The system dynamically adjusts resource allocation policies, enabling multiple trains to share routes when safe and maintaining exclusive allocation when safety requires, thus resolving the contradiction between capacity and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the allocation state parameter of route resources from static exclusive allocation to dynamic states including exclusive, shared, and locked. By modifying this parameter based on operational context, the system achieves both high capacity utilization and safety guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If multiple trains concurrently apply for route resources, then transport capacity is improved, but resource competition and deadlock risks increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransport capacityVSAvoiddeadlock protection
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where trains continuously report their positions and resource usage status to the control system. The control system processes this feedback and dynamically adjusts resource allocation to prevent deadlock conditions, allowing concurrent train operations while maintaining system reliability through real-time monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system acts as an intermediary between multiple trains competing for route resources. It coordinates resource allocation, manages concurrent applications, and prevents deadlock by mediating between conflicting train requests, thus enabling high transport capacity without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If exclusive resource allocation is used, then operation safety is ensured through conflict avoidance, but resource utilization efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation safetyVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments route resources into multiple allocation states (exclusive, shared, locked) rather than using a single exclusive allocation mode. This segmentation allows different portions of the system to operate under different allocation policies simultaneously, ensuring safety in critical segments while improving efficiency in non-critical segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Route resources are designed with multi-functional allocation capabilities, serving both exclusive and shared modes depending on operational needs. This universality allows the same resource to provide safety guarantees when exclusive allocation is required while enabling efficient utilization through shared allocation when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If traditional interlocking and train control systems are used, then safety functions are replicated, but system complexity and response time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety functionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the safety functions of traditional interlocking and train control systems into a unified resource management framework. By combining these previously separate functions into a single integrated system that handles both resource allocation and safety control, the system reduces overall complexity while maintaining comprehensive safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250206361A1Train control system and control method based on resource management
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 CASCO SIGNAL LTD
  • US20250206361A1 patent drawing
  • US20250206361A1 patent drawing
  • US20250206361A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A train control system and a control method based on resource management are disclosed. The system includes a dispatching center server, a trackside resource manager and a vehicle-mounted train control device. The vehicle-mounted train control device is connected to the dispatching center server and the trackside resource manager respectively; the dispatching center server is used to monitor and control the operation of a train; the trackside resource manager is used to manage a resource, control a switch, establish a movement authorization direction, and control an annunciator; and the vehicle-mounted train control device is used to calculate safe positioning, calculate a movement authorization, release a route resource, establish a train-train communication with front and back trains when the route resource is in a “shared” state to interact the safe positioning of the trains in real time, and determine an end point of the movement authorization for the back train.