Train Control System Using Terrain Profiles to Limit In-Train Forces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current railroad train operations face challenges in determining and controlling track features that affect train handling, leading to excessive in-train forces, which can cause damage to couplers, draft gear, and railcars, especially due to terrain features like crests, sags, and curves, requiring extensive operator experience and manual control adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that use terrain profiling and vehicle representation to derive control parameters, allowing for the identification of significant terrain features and adaptive control of railway systems to limit in-train forces, including the use of a terrain identification module that correlates track features with train characteristics to predict and manage coupler forces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If operators rely on experience for train control, then operational flexibility is maintained, but quantitative control precision and safety are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the operator's mechanical experience-based control with an automated computer system that uses mathematical models and calculations to determine precise control parameters. The system substitutes human judgment with computational algorithms that process terrain data, train characteristics, and operational constraints to generate exact control commands for tractive and braking effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a computer system as an intermediary between the operator and the train control mechanisms. This intermediary processes complex terrain profile data, applies mathematical models to predict train behavior, and translates these into actionable control parameters, thereby enabling precise quantitative control without requiring the operator to directly manage complex calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If terrain features are not accurately determined, then operational simplicity is maintained, but in-train forces cannot be controlled leading to damage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidterrain detection difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary determination of terrain features and prediction of train response before the train actually encounters these features. By pre-calculating the effects of crests, sags, and curves on in-train forces, the system can proactively adjust control parameters to prevent excessive forces from developing during actual train operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the system continuously monitors actual train response against predicted behavior and adjusts control parameters accordingly. This feedback loop ensures that terrain detection and control remain accurate even as operating conditions change, maintaining safety through ongoing verification and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If extensive operator experience is required for optimal control, then adaptive response to terrain is achieved, but operational time and training requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the train control system to be self-sufficient by automatically processing terrain data, calculating control parameters, and executing control commands without requiring operator intervention or expertise. The system serves itself by autonomously determining optimal tractive and braking effort based on real-time terrain profiles and train characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the operator's learned adaptive response mechanisms with an automated computer system that performs these functions through programmed algorithms. This substitution eliminates the need for extensive operator training while maintaining or improving adaptive response to terrain conditions through computational rather than experiential intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9120493B2Method and apparatus for determining track features and controlling a railroad train responsive thereto
Publication Date: 2015.09.01 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US9120493B2 patent drawing
  • US9120493B2 patent drawing
  • US9120493B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a control parameter of a railway system vehicle or a portion thereof, the method including producing a terrain profile representing a parameter of the railway system or a portion thereof, producing a representation of the vehicle or a portion thereof, and using the terrain profile and representation to derive the control parameter for the vehicle or the portion thereof.