Train Door Drive Control Apparatus Inverse Overrun Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing door drive control systems for train carriage doors often misidentify normal operations as inverse overrun conditions, leading to unnecessary braking, schedule interference, and safety hazards due to polar position misalignment and erroneous position detection, causing instrument depreciation and potential passenger injury.

Innovation Solution

A door drive control apparatus and method using feedback control with a power converter, a speed detector, and a trouble determiner to accurately identify inverse overrun conditions by comparing speed command and detection values, applying braking through zero voltage output, and predicting door speeds to prevent misidentification and ensure safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the overrun determination speed is set low for safety reasons, then the safety of door operation is improved, but normal operations are misidentified as inverse overrun conditions causing unnecessary braking

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of door operationVSAvoiddoor operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control apparatus uses feedback control by comparing the detected door speed with the commanded speed to determine actual door operation state. The feedback mechanism allows the system to distinguish between normal operational variations and actual inverse overrun conditions, preventing misidentification while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the overrun determination threshold based on the polarity relationship between commanded and detected speeds. By making the determination criterion adaptive rather than fixed, the system can accommodate normal operational dynamics while detecting actual overrun conditions, thus avoiding unnecessary braking during normal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the door is braked by carrying out the braking operation for an inverse overrun, then the safety of door operation is improved, but the train schedule is interfered with due to unnecessary stopping

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of door operationVSAvoidtrain schedule time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control apparatus continuously monitors the relationship between commanded and detected speeds through feedback control. This real-time feedback enables accurate distinction between normal operations and actual inverse overrun conditions, preventing unnecessary braking operations that would cause schedule delays while maintaining safety for actual overrun events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamic determination criteria that adapt to the operational context by evaluating the polarity relationship between commanded and detected speeds. This dynamic approach prevents premature or unnecessary braking during normal operations, thereby maintaining train schedules while still providing safety braking when actual inverse overrun occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of manufacture

If the zero voltage output is stopped and the power converter is gated off, then the instrument depreciation is prevented, but the braking of the motor is delayed causing danger of passenger injury

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument durabilityVSAvoidpassenger safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control apparatus applies braking through zero voltage output immediately upon detecting inverse overrun conditions, before gating off the power converter. This preliminary braking action ensures the motor is already decelerating when power is cut, preventing both instrument depreciation from continuous zero voltage output and passenger injury from delayed braking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides beforehand cushioning by initiating the braking operation (zero voltage output) prior to gating off the power converter. This preparatory braking action creates a cushioning effect that ensures the motor is already slowing down when power is removed, preventing both instrument damage and potential passenger injury from sudden motor stoppage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Data Source

PatentUS7906926B2Door drive control apparatus and door drive control method
Publication Date: 2011.03.15 FUJI ELECTRIC CO LTD
  • US7906926B2 patent drawing
  • US7906926B2 patent drawing
  • US7906926B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A door drive control apparatus capable of an accurate detection, without misidentifying an inverse overrun condition, and a door drive control method that improves safety. The door drive control apparatus includes a power converter that supplies power to a door drive linear motor, and operates the power converter by feedback control using a speed detection value and a speed command value of the door, and controls a speed of the door. The door drive control apparatus includes a speed trouble determiner, which outputs a door inverse direction speed trouble signal in the event that the speed command value of the door exceeds either a positive or negative first setting speed, and the speed detection value exceeds a second setting speed of a polarity opposite to that of the speed command value.