Train Model Mismatch Detection Using Dynamic Coupler Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for powered vehicles, such as trains, lack real-time detection and management of mismatch between modeled and actual behavior, particularly during 'run-in' or 'run-out' events, which can lead to derailment and other operational issues.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a coupler and controller that measures speed and acceleration to determine mismatches by comparing current conditions with stored patterns and thresholds, allowing for real-time adjustments to prevent derailment and optimize train handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a lumped-mass model is used to model train behavior, then the model is simple and easy to compute, but the model becomes invalid during run-in or run-out events causing mismatches with actual behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidmodel validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a static lumped-mass model to a dynamic model that adapts its characteristics based on train operating conditions. The system continuously monitors train parameters (speed, acceleration, jerk) and adjusts the model's mass distribution and coupling characteristics to reflect actual train behavior during different operational modes, particularly during run-in and run-out events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies key model parameters including mass distribution, coupling stiffness, and damping characteristics based on real-time train conditions. The system changes these parameters dynamically to maintain model validity across different operating scenarios, ensuring accurate representation of train behavior both during normal operation and during transient events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If train operators manually monitor for derailment conditions, then the system remains simple, but the system lacks real-time automatic detection and warning capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidderailment detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a closed-loop feedback system that continuously monitors train parameters (speed, acceleration, jerk) and compares them against predicted values from the dynamic model. When discrepancies exceed thresholds indicating potential derailment risk, the system provides real-time warnings to operators and can automatically adjust control parameters to mitigate risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical monitoring with an automated electronic detection system using sensors and computer processing. The system electronically measures train parameters, processes data through a controller, and provides automated warnings, eliminating the need for manual observation while significantly improving detection accuracy and response time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If the system monitors only current train parameters, then the system is simple, but it cannot detect rate of change effects that indicate run-in or run-out conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter monitoring complexityVSAvoidrun-in or run-out detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent calculates predicted train parameters before actual run-in or run-out events occur by continuously integrating the dynamic model with current train conditions. This allows the system to detect deviations from expected behavior patterns, identifying potential run-in or run-out conditions before they manifest as severe events, enabling early warning and preventive action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9002548B2System and method for determining a mismatch between a model for a powered system and the actual behavior of the powered system
Publication Date: 2015.04.07 TRANSPORTATION IP HOLDINGS LLC
  • US9002548B2 patent drawing
  • US9002548B2 patent drawing
  • US9002548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided for determining a mismatch between a model for a powered system and the actual behavior of the powered system. The system includes a coupler positioned between adjacent cars of the powered system. The coupler is positioned in a stretched slack state or a bunched slack state based upon the separation of the adjacent cars. The system further includes a controller positioned within the powered system. The controller is configured to determine a mismatch of the model. A method is also provided for determining a mismatch between a model for a powered system and the actual behavior of the powered system.