Train Operation Support System for Rescheduling Timetables

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing train operation support systems struggle to create rescheduled timetables that effectively manage passenger staying amounts at each station, especially during disruptions, due to limitations in considering variable passenger demands and modification contents of planned timetables.

Innovation Solution

A train operation support system that includes a timetable modification unit, a passenger flow prediction unit, and a timetable rescheduling unit to adjust predicted passenger staying amounts at each station. This system modifies planned timetables based on given methods, calculates passenger staying information using demand data, and creates rescheduled timetables that optimize staying amounts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a large-scale or wide-range modification of planned timetable is made to restore passenger services during disruption, then passenger service restoration is improved, but train operation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger service restorationVSAvoidtrain operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the timetable modification process into distinct phases: disruption detection, alternative route calculation, and phased rescheduling. By dividing the complex restoration process into manageable segments, the system can handle large-scale modifications systematically while maintaining operational control and reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of alternative routes and rescheduling options before actual disruption occurs. By pre-computing multiple contingency timetables and storing them for quick retrieval, the system enables rapid service restoration without the complexity of real-time decision-making during disruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If train operators perform rescheduling work while paying sufficient attention to demands of passengers, then passenger demand satisfaction is improved, but workload of train operators increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger demand satisfactionVSAvoidworkload of train operators
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements continuous feedback loops that monitor passenger demand patterns, train occupancy rates, and timetable adherence. This automated feedback mechanism provides real-time information to operators, enabling them to make informed rescheduling decisions that satisfy passenger demands without requiring manual analysis of complex data sets, thus reducing workload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables automated self-service rescheduling by allowing the timetable optimization algorithm to automatically adjust schedules based on detected passenger demands and disruption conditions. This reduces operator workload by handling routine rescheduling decisions autonomously while still adapting to passenger needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Quantity of substance

If the number of trains is increased to meet passenger demands, then passenger transport capacity is improved, but operational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger transport capacityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts train deployment based on real-time passenger demand detection and disruption conditions. By continuously optimizing the number and positioning of trains according to actual needs rather than fixed schedules, the system maximizes transport capacity during high-demand periods while reducing train operations during low-demand periods, thereby optimizing operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key operational parameters such as train frequency, headway intervals, and route assignments based on detected passenger demands and disruption severity. By dynamically adjusting these parameters rather than increasing train numbers permanently, the system achieves improved transport capacity when needed while avoiding continuous high operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12280813B2Train operation support system and train operation support method
Publication Date: 2025.04.22 HITACHI LTD
  • US12280813B2 patent drawing
  • US12280813B2 patent drawing
  • US12280813B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A train operation support system for outputting a rescheduled timetable for a planned timetable of a train from a computer by using the planned timetable and an actual timetable of the train includes a timetable modification unit that modifies the planned timetable by using a given timetable modification method, a passenger flow prediction unit that calculates passenger staying information containing information indicating the number of staying passengers in each time zone at each station, by using demand information indicating a destination of a passenger in each time zone at each station where the train stops, a timetable rescheduling unit that modifies the demand information in reference to the planned timetable modified by the timetable modification unit, inputs the modified demand information to the passenger flow prediction unit, and creates the rescheduled timetable for the planned timetable by using the passenger staying information output from the passenger flow prediction unit, and an output unit that outputs the rescheduled timetable created by the timetable rescheduling unit.