Training Data Outlier Scoring for Inconsistent Annotation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional outlier detection methods fail to reliably identify inconsistent data annotations in machine learning datasets, leading to erroneous outputs and cumbersome mitigation actions.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes data points in a joint input-output space to determine input and output outlier scores, generating a total outlier score to identify and exclude inconsistent data points, thereby improving the quality of training datasets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional outlier detection methods are used, then the detection process is simple, but inconsistent data annotations cannot be reliably identified

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines input outlier detection and output outlier detection into a unified framework that evaluates data points in both input and output spaces simultaneously. This merging allows the system to reliably identify inconsistent annotations by considering both input feature deviations and output label deviations together, rather than relying on either method alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extends outlier detection from a single-dimensional input space to a joint input-output space by introducing output outlier scores. This dimensional expansion enables the detection system to capture inconsistencies that manifest in the output labels while maintaining their relationship to input features, thereby improving detection reliability without excessive complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If conventional outlier detection methods are used, then the processing speed is fast, but detection accuracy is insufficient for vast and intricate datasets

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the outlier detection process into distinct components: input outlier score calculation, output outlier score calculation, and combined assessment. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while maintaining overall efficiency, enabling accurate detection in vast datasets without sacrificing processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary outlier score calculations for both input and output dimensions before making final detection decisions. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-compute necessary metrics, reducing the computational burden during final detection and maintaining productivity while achieving higher accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If inconsistent data annotations are not identified, then the training process is efficient, but model performance is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel performance reliabilityVSAvoiddata preprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the detection system automatically identifies and flags inconsistent data annotations without requiring manual review. This automation maintains model performance reliability by systematically detecting issues while minimizing the time loss associated with manual data preprocessing and verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If comprehensive outlier detection is performed, then detection thoroughness is high, but computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection thoroughnessVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by focusing computational resources on calculating outlier scores only for data points that show deviations in either input or output dimensions. Rather than performing exhaustive analysis on all data points uniformly, the system selectively intensifies detection efforts where anomalies are likely, achieving thorough detection with reduced energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250378368A1Systems and methods for generating improved training data for machine learning applications
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 OPTUM INC
  • US20250378368A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378368A1 patent drawing
  • US20250378368A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for generating training data for a machine learning model. The method includes receiving, from one or more data sources, a first machine learning training data set that includes a plurality of data points; determining an input outlier score of a first data point of the plurality of data points; determining an output outlier score of the first data point; generating a total output score of the first data point based on the input outlier score of the first data point and the output outlier score of the first data point, the total output score of the first data point representing a likelihood that the first data point is an inconsistently annotated data point; comparing the total output score of the first data point with a pre-determined threshold; based on the comparison, generating a second machine learning training data set that excludes the first data point.