Training UE Selection Using NWDAF for Reliable Federated Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In mobile communication systems, federated learning is hindered by issues such as terminals not completing training normally or failing to upload trained models to the server, leading to deteriorated model performance.

Innovation Solution

A method for selecting user equipment (UE) using network data analytics functions (NWDAF) to provide QoS sustainability analytics, ensuring reliable model training by excluding UEs likely to fail, and enhancing the 5G system's control plane to manage model distribution and aggregation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If terminals participate in federated learning training, then model training diversity is improved, but training completion reliability deteriorates due to terminals not completing training normally or failing to upload models

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel training diversityVSAvoidtraining completion reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by selecting training terminals in advance based on predicted training completion probabilities. The network device calculates completion probabilities for candidate terminals and pre-selects terminals with high probabilities before training begins, ensuring reliable participants are chosen beforehand. This prevents terminals likely to fail from being selected, thus maintaining training completion reliability while still achieving diversity through the selection process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring terminal training status and using historical completion data to update completion probability predictions. The network device receives feedback on whether terminals complete training and uses this information to refine future selections. This feedback loop ensures that terminals with demonstrated reliability are preferentially selected, resolving the contradiction between maintaining diversity and ensuring completion reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If all candidate terminals are selected for training, then training data diversity is improved, but system resource consumption increases due to multiple terminals potentially failing training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining data diversityVSAvoidsystem resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering of candidate terminals based on predicted completion probabilities before allocating training resources. By calculating completion probabilities and selecting only terminals above a threshold, the system avoids wasting computational resources on terminals likely to fail. This preliminary action maintains diversity among selected terminals while significantly reducing energy consumption by excluding poor performers in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial selection rather than selecting all candidate terminals. Instead of including every available terminal in training (excessive action), it selectively includes only those with high completion probabilities (partial action). This approach achieves sufficient diversity for effective federated learning while avoiding the resource waste of including terminals unlikely to complete training successfully.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Device complexity

If terminal selection is done without analytics, then system complexity is reduced, but model performance deteriorates due to unreliable terminal selection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidmodel performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary analytics function that acts as a bridge between simple terminal selection and complex performance optimization. The NWDAF analytics function provides completion probability predictions that guide terminal selection, achieving reliable model performance without requiring the entire system to become complex. This intermediary layer handles the analytical complexity while keeping the core selection mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing terminals to self-evaluate their training completion likelihood based on their own characteristics and historical performance. The analytics function uses terminal-provided information and historical data to generate completion probabilities, reducing the need for complex centralized evaluation. This self-service approach maintains model performance reliability while minimizing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12513538B2Apparatus and method for selecting training UE in a mobile communication system
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 ELECTRONICS & TELECOMM RES INST
  • US12513538B2 patent drawing
  • US12513538B2 patent drawing
  • US12513538B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and an apparatus for selecting UE through steps of requesting analytics for selecting the UE to participate in an AI/ML operation from an NWDAF in a core network and selecting the UE based on the analytics.