Mobile Object Trajectory Control Using Mode-Based Event Acceptance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric vehicle travel support systems may not allow the vehicle to travel on a route suitable for the user, as they lack the ability to adapt and optimize trajectories based on user preferences and environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

A control system for mobile objects that can operate in multiple modes, generating evaluation information for trajectories based on acceptance levels associated with each mode, allowing the system to determine and adjust trajectories to avoid unsuitable events and optimize routes for user satisfaction, comfort, and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the electric vehicle uses a fixed travel support system, then the system structure is simple, but the vehicle cannot adapt to different user preferences and travel scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user preferencesVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements multiple operation modes (first operation mode emphasizing safety, second operation mode emphasizing efficiency) that allow the travel support system to dynamically adapt to different user preferences and travel scenarios. The control system switches between modes based on user selection, enabling the same physical system to exhibit different behavioral characteristics without requiring multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the acceptance level parameter for events based on the selected operation mode. In the first operation mode, the acceptance level for events like passing over steps or boundary crossings is set lower (more conservative), while in the second operation mode, the acceptance level is set higher (more efficient). This parameter adjustment allows the system to adapt its trajectory evaluation without hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the electric vehicle prioritizes travel efficiency, then the travel time is reduced, but the ride comfort and user satisfaction deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel efficiencyVSAvoidride comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts trajectory evaluation criteria based on the selected operation mode. When efficiency is prioritized (second operation mode), the system allows trajectories with higher acceptance levels for certain events, enabling faster travel. When comfort is prioritized (first operation mode), the system uses stricter evaluation criteria. This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by allowing the same system to optimize for different goals depending on user preference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The acceptance level parameter for evaluating trajectory events is changed based on operation mode. The control system generates different evaluation information for the same trajectory depending on whether the first or second operation mode is active, allowing flexible optimization between efficiency and comfort without compromising either extreme.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the electric vehicle avoids all potential events strictly, then the user safety is improved, but the travel route flexibility and speed are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser safetyVSAvoidtravel speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an acceptance level parameter that quantifies the risk threshold for allowing certain events. In the first operation mode, the acceptance level is set lower, requiring stricter safety conditions and avoiding more events. In the second operation mode, the acceptance level is raised, allowing the vehicle to take calculated risks for improved speed. This parameter-based approach resolves the contradiction by making safety requirements adjustable rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts its safety criteria based on the selected operation mode rather than maintaining a fixed safety threshold. The control system generates mode-dependent evaluation information that balances safety and speed requirements, allowing the vehicle to be more conservative when safety is prioritized and more aggressive when speed is prioritized.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12189391B2Control system, mobile object, control method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12189391B2 patent drawing
  • US12189391B2 patent drawing
  • US12189391B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system of a mobile object that can move in any one operation mode determined from a plurality of operation modes is provided. The control system includes: a storage device configured to store instructions; and one or more processors, wherein the one or more processors execute the instructions stored in the storage device to: generate evaluation information for a trajectory of the mobile object including a trajectory on a sidewalk; each of the plurality of operation modes being associated with an acceptance level for an event that may occur when the mobile object moves along a trajectory; and generate the evaluation information for the trajectory based on the acceptance level in the operation mode associated with an event that occurs when moving along the trajectory.