Vehicle Trajectory Deadlock Classification in Constrained Traffic Areas

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Planning trajectories for heavy-duty vehicles to avoid traffic deadlocks in constrained areas is challenging, especially for autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles, as they require complex motion support devices and can be difficult to extricate from deadlock situations, necessitating special skills and equipment.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method assesses vehicle trajectories using a connected directed graph to identify potential deadlocks by updating vehicle states iteratively, classifying explicit and implicit deadlocks, and storing them in memory to inform traffic planning and site design, allowing for proactive avoidance of deadlocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If multiple heavy-duty vehicles operate autonomously or semi-autonomously in a site with traffic-constrained areas, then vehicle automation and operational flexibility are improved, but the risk of traffic deadlocks increases and trajectory planning becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle automationVSAvoidtrajectory planning complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting potential deadlock states before vehicles actually enter them. The system iteratively updates vehicle states and classifies explicit and implicit deadlock states in advance, allowing the trajectory planner to avoid these states proactively rather than reacting after deadlocks occur. This resolves the contradiction by enabling automated operation while simplifying planning through preemptive deadlock avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the classified deadlock states to continuously improve trajectory planning. The system stores explicit and implicit deadlock states and uses this information to adjust and optimize vehicle trajectories, creating a closed-loop system where planning decisions are refined based on predicted deadlock scenarios. This feedback mechanism enables high-level automation while managing planning complexity through learned patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If vehicles follow planned trajectories in traffic-constrained areas, then operational efficiency is improved, but the likelihood of encountering deadlocks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiddeadlock-free operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by taking measures to prevent deadlocks before they occur. The system identifies explicit and implicit deadlock states and uses this information to modify trajectories in advance, counteracting the tendency of fixed trajectory following to cause deadlocks. This allows vehicles to maintain high operational efficiency while proactively preventing reliability issues related to deadlocks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making trajectory planning adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts trajectories based on predicted deadlock states, allowing vehicles to deviate from planned paths when necessary to avoid deadlocks. This dynamic approach maintains productivity by minimizing disruptions while improving reliability through flexible deadlock avoidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Measurement precision

If explicit and implicit deadlock states are classified and stored, then deadlock prediction accuracy is improved, but computational requirements and memory usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeadlock prediction accuracyVSAvoidmemory storage requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies taking out by separating explicit and implicit deadlock states into distinct classifications. The system extracts and stores only the essential deadlock state information needed for prediction, rather than storing all possible trajectory combinations. This extraction approach improves prediction accuracy by focusing on critical deadlock patterns while reducing memory requirements by storing only necessary state classifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If vehicle trajectories are adapted to avoid deadlocks, then operational reliability is improved, but trajectory optimization and site design complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeadlock-free operationVSAvoidtrajectory optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-classifying deadlock states before trajectory optimization. The system identifies explicit and implicit deadlock states in advance and uses this pre-computed information to guide trajectory adjustments, rather than performing complex optimization during real-time operation. This approach improves reliability through proactive deadlock avoidance while reducing the computational complexity of real-time trajectory optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240386794A1Preventive deadlock classifier
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 VOLVO AUTONOMOUS SOLUTIONS AB
  • US20240386794A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386794A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386794A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method of assessing vehicle trajectories for deadlock scenarios in a site where multiple vehicles operate by following planned vehicle trajectories is described. The site includes at least one traffic-constrained area via which at least two of the multiple vehicles passes when following their planned trajectories.