Trajectory-Based Maneuvering Control for Autonomous Driving Comfort

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous driving systems face challenges in optimizing manoeuvring controller configurations to balance control accuracy and vehicle occupant comfort across diverse driving situations, often requiring reliance on external sensor data and high-definition maps.

Innovation Solution

A control system that determines manoeuvring control configurations based on internal analysis of planned trajectory characteristics, such as yaw angle, orientation, and curvature, without needing external sensor data, and adapts these configurations dynamically to enhance performance in specific driving scenarios.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the manoeuvring controller uses a fixed configuration, then the system is simple to implement, but it cannot optimize control accuracy and comfort across diverse driving situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to diverse driving situationsVSAvoidcontroller configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation by enabling the manoeuvring controller to automatically adjust its configuration parameters in real-time based on the planned trajectory characteristics. The controller transitions from a static fixed configuration to a dynamic adaptive system that selects optimal parameters (such as PID gains, control horizon, or model predictive control settings) according to the current driving situation encoded in the trajectory plan, thereby achieving adaptability without requiring complex external sensor processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the manoeuvring controller based on trajectory characteristics. Specifically, it adjusts controller parameters (such as proportional, integral, and derivative gains in PID control, or weighting factors in model predictive control) in response to trajectory features like curvature, speed variations, and lane change magnitude. This parameter adaptation allows the same controller hardware to optimize performance across diverse driving situations without physical reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the system relies on external sensor data and high-definition maps for configuration selection, then it can achieve accurate situation awareness, but it increases system complexity and data processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving situation recognition accuracyVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and utilizes only the essential trajectory characteristics from the trajectory plan that are sufficient for configuration selection, rather than processing complete external sensor data and high-definition maps. By focusing on key trajectory features (such as curvature, speed profiles, and maneuver type) already computed by the trajectory planner, the system achieves accurate situation awareness while eliminating the complexity of integrating and processing multiple external data sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces the trajectory plan as an intermediary that mediates between the complex external environment perception (sensors and maps) and the manoeuvring controller configuration selection. Instead of directly processing sensor data and maps to determine controller settings, the system uses the pre-computed trajectory plan—which already encapsulates the driving situation—as the basis for configuration selection, thereby simplifying the system architecture while maintaining accurate situation awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If the manoeuvring controller is optimized for high control accuracy, then it performs well in precision manoeuvres, but it may reduce vehicle occupant comfort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol accuracyVSAvoidvehicle occupant comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by selecting different controller configurations tailored to specific trajectory characteristics and driving situations. For example, it uses higher gain settings and more aggressive control parameters for precision manoeuvres requiring high accuracy (such as tight lane changes or parking), while switching to lower gain settings and smoother control profiles for comfort-critical situations (such as gentle lane changes or straight-line cruising). This localized optimization ensures that control accuracy and comfort are both maximized in their respective contexts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the controller configuration to balance accuracy and comfort in real-time based on the driving situation. The system transitions between different control strategies (such as switching between aggressive and conservative PID gains, or adjusting model predictive control weightings) according to the current trajectory characteristics, thereby achieving an optimal trade-off between control accuracy and occupant comfort that adapts to the immediate driving context rather than being fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4561884B1Control system and method for controlling autonomous driving of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.01.28 JAGUAR LAND ROVER LTD
  • EP4561884B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4561884B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP4561884B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

There is provided a control system (200), a method (700) and computer software (208) for controlling autonomous driving of a vehicle (1). The control system (200) comprises one or more controllers (201). The control system (200) is configured to: obtain information (702) indicative of one or more trajectory characteristics associated with a planned local trajectory (4, 5) of the vehicle (1); and determine (706) a manoeuvring control configuration in dependence on the one or more trajectory characteristics, wherein the manoeuvring control configuration is configured to control autonomous manoeuvring actuations of the vehicle (1) associated with following the planned local trajectory.