Multi-Modal Trajectory Prediction Evaluation Without Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing behavior prediction systems for autonomous vehicles face challenges in accurately evaluating multi-modal trajectory predictions without computationally expensive simulations or on-board deployment, as current evaluation metrics are ill-suited for measuring the quality of these predictions.

Innovation Solution

A mean average precision (mAP)-based evaluation metric is developed to assess the quality of behavior prediction systems, specifically tailored for multi-modal trajectory predictions in autonomous driving scenarios, allowing for accurate evaluation without simulation or on-board deployment, by computing an evaluation metric that considers the quality of predictions for various trajectory shapes encountered by autonomous vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If computationally expensive simulation or on-board deployment is used to evaluate behavior prediction systems, then measurement precision is improved, but use of energy and computational resources worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a simplified evaluation metric that copies only the essential elements needed for assessment - using ground truth trajectory labels and basic geometric computations instead of full simulation environments. This allows accurate evaluation of multi-modal trajectory predictions without the computational burden of running complete simulations or deploying systems on actual vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If existing evaluation metrics are used for multi-modal trajectory predictions, then ease of operation is improved, but measurement precision worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoidprediction quality measurement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters from traditional single-trajectory metrics to multi-modal specific parameters including trajectory shape classification (straight, curved, U-turn), modal coverage assessment, and precision-recall curves tailored for multiple possible trajectories. This maintains computational simplicity while dramatically improving measurement precision for multi-modal predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If a comprehensive evaluation metric considering multiple trajectory shapes is computed, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation metric accuracyVSAvoidevaluation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the evaluation process into distinct, manageable components: trajectory shape classification (straight, curved, U-turn), modal identification, precision-recall computation for each modality, and aggregation into overall metrics. This segmentation maintains high measurement precision while reducing system complexity through modular, independent computation steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12195013B2Evaluating multi-modal trajectory predictions for autonomous driving
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 WAYMO LLC
  • US12195013B2 patent drawing
  • US12195013B2 patent drawing
  • US12195013B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for evaluating a behavior prediction system.