Tram Collision Warning System Using Driver Gaze Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Collision warning systems for trams often issue unnecessary warnings in complex traffic situations, particularly when pedestrians are present, leading to driver frustration and potential dismissal of the system, as they detect objects even if the driver is aware of them, necessitating a more nuanced approach to warning thresholds based on driver attention and line of sight.

Innovation Solution

The system adjusts its warning parameters based on driver line of sight detection using a camera to determine the driver's viewing direction, issuing warnings from different distance thresholds depending on whether the collision object is within the driver's line of sight, and adapting these thresholds to the vehicle's speed and the driver's alertness and reaction time, thereby reducing irrelevant warnings and enhancing relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If collision warning systems issue warnings for all detected collision objects, then detection reliability is improved, but false warning rate increases leading to driver frustration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection reliabilityVSAvoidfalse warnings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different warning distance thresholds based on the local condition of driver attention. When the driver is attentive (gaze directed forward), a larger distance threshold is used, reducing false warnings. When the driver is inattentive, a smaller threshold is applied to maintain safety. This localized adaptation of the warning parameter resolves the contradiction between comprehensive detection and false alarm reduction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The warning distance threshold is made dynamic rather than static. The system continuously monitors driver gaze direction and adjusts the warning threshold in real-time based on driver attention state. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to maintain high detection reliability while adapting to current driving conditions to minimize false warnings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the warning distance threshold is increased to detect objects earlier, then safety is improved, but the number of warnings increases including irrelevant ones

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidnumber of warnings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality by applying different distance thresholds based on driver attention state. For attentive drivers, a larger threshold provides early warning for safety. For inattentive drivers, a smaller threshold is used to avoid irrelevant warnings about objects the driver cannot perceive. This resolves the contradiction between early detection and warning relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the system suppresses warnings for objects in the driver's line of sight, then false warnings are reduced, but detection of unknown objects may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveirrelevant warningsVSAvoidobject detection reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the warning threshold based on real-time driver gaze detection. When the driver's gaze is directed toward a detected object, the system suppresses the warning as it's likely already noticed. When gaze is directed elsewhere, warnings are issued even for objects within the field of view, ensuring unknown objects are detected. This dynamic approach resolves the contradiction between reducing false warnings and maintaining detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces unnecessary warnings, ensuring that only relevant collision objects are alerted to the driver, improving the system's effectiveness in complex scenarios and supporting safe tram operation by accounting for driver awareness and attention levels.

Implementation Method 1

a camera (16), in particular a gaze direction detection camera, directed towards a driver (18) of the rail vehicle (10) such that the camera can detect the position of the driver's (19) eyes and pupils

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP4197881A1Method for operating a collision warning system of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.06.21 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • EP4197881A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4197881A1 patent drawing
  • EP4197881A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a collision warning system of a vehicle, in particular a tram, wherein the collision warning system comprises a remote-view sensor and is configured to recognize an object in the vehicle's path as a collision object based on signals from the remote-view sensor and to determine the position of the collision object, wherein an operating parameter of the collision warning system is changed depending on the driver's gaze direction detection. The invention also relates to a device, a machine-readable storage medium, and a vehicle.