Trampoline Fall Protection Rope Tensioning Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Trampoline training for individuals with disabilities or impaired balance poses significant risks due to lack of independence and increased staffing costs, and existing securing systems are unsuitable as they lift or control the user, altering the natural weight and balance experience.

Innovation Solution

A fall protection device comprising a non-resilient rope connected to the user via a safety vest, a tautening device to maintain rope tension with minimal retraction force, and a device limiting rope extension to prevent falls, allowing users to train independently while ensuring safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a securing system is used to protect users during trampoline training, then safety is improved, but the user experience is worsened because the system lifts or controls the user, altering natural weight and balance experience

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the physical parameters of the securing system by using a non-resilient rope with minimal retraction force, allowing the rope to remain taut without actively lifting or controlling the user. This maintains safety while preserving natural weight and balance experience during trampoline training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a tautening device as an intermediary mechanism that maintains rope tension passively without actively interfering with user movement. The device ensures the rope remains taut for safety while allowing natural bouncing motion, mediating between safety requirements and user experience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Force

If a tautening device exerts high retraction force to hold the rope taut, then rope tension is improved, but balance training effectiveness is worsened because natural balance reflexes cannot be trained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverope tensionVSAvoidbalance training effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the retraction force parameter to be as low as possible while maintaining adequate rope tension. This allows the rope to provide safety without interfering with natural balance reflexes, enabling effective balance training for users with disabilities or impaired balance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If existing securing systems are used on trampolines, then safety is improved, but device suitability is worsened because the systems are designed for treadmill/locomotion use and lift the user

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice suitability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adapts the securing system specifically for trampoline use by modifying local characteristics: using a non-resilient rope instead of elastic cords, minimizing retraction force, and positioning the system to allow natural bouncing motion. This makes the safety system suitable for trampoline training while maintaining its protective function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS9387384B2Fall protection device
Publication Date: 2016.07.12 ANGEHRN AG UMFORMTECHN
  • US9387384B2 patent drawing
  • US9387384B2 patent drawing
  • US9387384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fall protection device for trampolines includes at least one rope which is preferably substantially non-resilient and can be connected to a user of the trampoline. At least one tautening device is provided for holding the rope taut when the fall protection device is in use. Also provided is at least one device for limiting the rope extension.