Trampoline Frame with Flexible Plates for Springless Bounce

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional trampolines with extension springs pose safety hazards and manufacturing inefficiencies, and soft-edged trampolines lack the traditional feel and performance.

Innovation Solution

A trampoline design featuring a frame with flexible and resilient plates extending upwards, connected to a jumping mat without extension springs, using flexible rods or tubes for support, and a safety net system for enhanced safety and performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If extension springs are used to secure the jumping mat to the frame, then the trampoline provides traditional bounce performance, but safety hazards increase due to exposed springs and spaces between mat and frame

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsafety hazards from springs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes extension springs from the trampoline design entirely, extracting the harmful element while maintaining the bouncing function through alternative means (flexible mat supported by legs without springs). This eliminates the safety hazards associated with exposed springs and the spaces between the mat and frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a flexible jumping mat that is supported directly on the frame without springs, relying on the mat's own flexibility and the frame structure to provide the bouncing effect. This eliminates the need for exposed springs while maintaining trampoline functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

2Ease of manufacture

If a frame with spaced legs and extension springs is used, then traditional trampoline structure is maintained, but manufacturing complexity and assembly difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidframe and spring assembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent eliminates extension springs from the assembly, removing a complex component that requires precise installation. This simplifies both the manufacturing process and final assembly, as the mat is directly supported on the frame without requiring spring attachment to radial slots and hooks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using springs to connect the mat to the frame (traditional approach), the patent inverts the approach by having the mat directly rest on and be supported by the frame structure itself, reversing the conventional connection method and simplifying the overall assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If soft edged trampolines without frames and extension springs are used, then safety is improved by eliminating springs, but the traditional trampoline feel and performance are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraditional trampoline feelVSAvoidloss of traditional performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different structural qualities to different parts of the system: a rigid frame structure provides stable support and traditional performance characteristics, while the flexible mat provides the necessary compliance and bounce. This localized differentiation maintains traditional feel while improving safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure serves multiple functions: it provides the structural foundation, supports the mat directly without springs, defines the trampoline boundary, and maintains the traditional aesthetic and performance characteristics. This multi-functionality eliminates springs while preserving traditional feel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design provides a safer, more efficient manufacturing process while maintaining the traditional trampoline feel, offering improved user safety and performance without the need for extension springs.

Implementation Method 1

a plurality of spaced apart flexible and resilient plates extending upwards from said frame and connected thereto against relative movement therebetween

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The rods are flexible and resilient so as to bend downwards and inwards as a person's weight comes onto the mat during jumping and to return to the original position as the weight comes off the mat causing a back and forth twisting motion of the mat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTorsion: Torsion Spring

Data Source

PatentUS9089732B2Trampolines
Publication Date: 2015.07.28 VULY PROPERTY
  • US9089732B2 patent drawing
  • US9089732B2 patent drawing
  • US9089732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A trampoline which is reliable and efficient in use, and which does not require extension springs to secure the jumping mat to the frame. The trampoline may maintains the traditional feel of a trampoline more satisfactorily than presently known soft edged trampolines. The trampoline may also be efficiently manufactured.