Multi-Surface Trampoline with Rotating Arms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing trampoline systems lack innovative designs that enhance user experience and safety, particularly in configurations with multiple jumping surfaces and rotating members.

Innovation Solution

The trampoline system comprises four or more jumping surfaces extending between a central axis and an outer edge, with opposite side surface edges forming angles of 90° or less, and includes a rotating member with vertically-extending and horizontally-extending arms, allowing for a unique assembly and usage method.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple jumping surfaces are arranged with acute angles (≤90°) between opposite sides, then user safety is improved by reducing harmful contact areas, but device complexity increases due to the multi-surface configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontact risk with rotating armsVSAvoidmulti-surface configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The trampoline system is divided into four separate jumping surfaces (first, second, third, and fourth surfaces) arranged at specific angles to each other. This segmentation creates distinct zones that reduce the probability of harmful contact between users and rotating arms, while maintaining overall system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The jumping surfaces are configured with asymmetric angular relationships, where opposite sides form angles of 90° or less, creating an uneven distribution of contact risk zones. This asymmetric arrangement ensures that rotating arms pass through areas with minimal user presence, reducing harmful interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Adaptability or versatility

If a rotating member with horizontally-extending arms is added to enhance user engagement, then entertainment value is improved, but safety risks increase due to potential contact with rotating components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser engagementVSAvoidcontact with rotating arms
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The rotating member with horizontally-extending arms operates in a different spatial dimension than the jumping surfaces. The rotation occurs along the central axis, creating a vertical-dimensional separation between the primary jumping activity and the rotating components, thereby reducing contact risk while maintaining entertainment value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The centrally-located rotating member acts as an intermediary element that adds entertainment value without directly interfering with the jumping surfaces. The horizontal arms extend into open space between the angled surfaces, creating a mediating structure that enhances user engagement while maintaining safety zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3263188B1Trampoline systems and methods of making and using the same
Publication Date: 2019.11.13 FUN SPOT MFG LLC
  • EP3263188B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3263188B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3263188B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Trampoline systems containing multiple trampoline jumping surfaces are disclosed. Methods of making and using trampoline systems containing multiple trampoline jumping surfaces are also disclosed.