Transaction Benefit Selection System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems and methods do not allow customers to selectively determine which transactions receive particular rewards or benefits, nor do they enable dynamic identification and application of benefits or rewards based on customer or transaction history.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that enables customers to control payment and accrual of benefits or rewards on a transaction-by-transaction basis, allowing for the selection of benefits such as pausing transactions to avoid interest, extending payment due dates, or applying rewards, based on customer preferences and transaction history.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional reward systems are used, then customers receive rewards through predetermined programs, but customers cannot selectively determine which transactions receive particular rewards or benefits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveselectivity of reward applicationVSAvoidcustomer control over transactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the reward application process by allowing customers to select specific transactions individually rather than applying rewards broadly across all transactions. The interface divides transaction history into discrete selectable items, enabling granular control over which transactions receive benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static predetermined reward programs to dynamic customer-driven reward allocation. Customers can dynamically select which transactions to apply rewards to based on current needs, transaction characteristics, and financial goals, making the system adaptable and flexible.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If conventional reward systems are used, then rewards are applied automatically based on program rules, but the system cannot dynamically identify and apply benefits based on customer or transaction history

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic reward applicationVSAvoiddynamic identification of benefits
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops where customer selections and transaction data are continuously analyzed. The system learns from customer choices and transaction patterns to provide intelligent recommendations and dynamically identify suitable rewards, combining automation with adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-processes transaction history and identifies potential reward opportunities before customer selection. By analyzing transaction characteristics in advance and preparing reward recommendations, the system reduces customer effort while maintaining dynamic adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If customers want to pause transactions to avoid interest or extend payment due dates, then financial flexibility is enhanced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial flexibilityVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides multiple financial management functions through a single unified interface: reward application, transaction pausing, payment date extension, and interest management. This multi-functionality achieves high financial flexibility without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between the customer and complex financial operations. This intermediary interface simplifies complex actions like pausing transactions or extending payment dates into user-friendly selections, shielding customers from underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11348132B1System and method for applying benefits to transactions
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US11348132B1 patent drawing
  • US11348132B1 patent drawing
  • US11348132B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for presenting an offer to a customer are disclosed. In one embodiment, a method may include (1) a computer application executed by an electronic device comprising a computer processor receiving a selection of a financing offer from a customer; (2) the computer application receiving, from a back end server, an identification of at least one transaction conducted with a financial instrument that is eligible for the financing offer; (3) the computer application presenting the customer with the at least one eligible transaction; (4) the computer application receiving a selection of one of the at least one eligible transactions; (5) the computer application presenting the customer with at least one option associated with the financing offer; (6) the computer application receiving a selection of one of the options; and (7) the computer application communicating the selection of the transaction and the option to the back end server.