Transaction Container Circuitry for Blockchain Data Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current blockchain techniques fail to enable users to maintain control over their data, leading to trust issues and inefficiencies in data sharing across siloed platforms, with existing solutions lacking reliable verification of data integrity and access controls, resulting in complex, costly, and inefficient data management.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of transaction containers that encapsulate contextual dependencies, allowing users to control and port their data, with features like immediate ledger storage, encryption, and certification by both users and transaction hosts, ensuring data integrity and independence from centralized authorities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If blockchain techniques are used for data verification, then data integrity is improved, but user control over data is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata integrityVSAvoiduser control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments control by introducing multiple roles (data owner, data custodian, verifier) with distinct permissions. The data owner retains control through private keys and can revoke access, while the custodian manages storage and the verifier ensures integrity. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by distributing control rather than centralizing it in a way that eliminates user agency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a custodian as an intermediary between the user and the blockchain system. The custodian holds encrypted data and manages access without having decryption capabilities, acting as a trusted mediator that enables user control while maintaining data integrity through cryptographic verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If centralized authorities are used for data management, then trust requirements are reduced, but latency and efficiency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrust requirementsVSAvoidlatency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated cryptographic verification. Data integrity is verified automatically using digital signatures and hash functions without requiring manual trust in centralized authorities. This automation reduces both trust requirements and latency by eliminating manual verification steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where verifiers provide cryptographic proof of data integrity back to the system. This automated feedback loop enables continuous verification without centralized coordination, reducing both trust requirements and verification latency through distributed consensus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If data is stored across siloed platforms, then data sharing is improved, but verification of data integrity becomes complex and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sharingVSAvoidverification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal verification mechanism using standardized cryptographic protocols that work across different platforms. The same digital signature and hash verification methods can be applied regardless of which platform stores the data, simplifying verification complexity while enabling broad data sharing across siloed systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates cryptographic copies (hashes and signatures) of data that can be verified without accessing the original data storage location. These lightweight cryptographic copies enable verification across multiple platforms without requiring complex access to each platform's storage system, reducing verification complexity while maintaining data sharing capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20230230091A1Methods, systems, articles of manufacture and apparatus to control transactional data
Publication Date: 2023.07.20 INTEL CORP
  • US20230230091A1 patent drawing
  • US20230230091A1 patent drawing
  • US20230230091A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatus, systems, and articles of manufacture are disclosed to control transactional data. An example apparatus disclosed herein includes memory, machine readable instructions, and processor circuitry to at least one of instantiate or execute the machine readable instructions to populate encrypted input data into a first portion of a data structure, populate an encryption key into a second portion of the data structure, cause the first portion of the data structure to be signed with (a) credentials corresponding to an owner of the encrypted data and (b) credentials corresponding to a transaction host, and store the data structure in a ledger.