Transaction Data Deployment with Predictive Validation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current approaches for deploying transaction data across different database systems require manual modification of dependent master data, which is inefficient and prone to errors, and may result in failed deployments due to structural misalignment or missing/inaccurate master data.

Innovation Solution

The solution involves generating multiple instances of a transaction data template with known master data values, using a predictive model to determine deployable instances, and deploying only those instances that can be successfully integrated into the target system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual modification of master data is performed for each transaction data deployment, then deployment customization is possible, but deployment efficiency deteriorates and error rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment customizationVSAvoiddeployment efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating multiple instances of transaction data templates with placeholder master data references before deployment. This allows the deployment process to automatically resolve these placeholders against the target system's master data, eliminating the need for manual modification while maintaining customization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service by enabling transaction data instances to automatically resolve their own master data dependencies during deployment. The system autonomously matches placeholder references with actual master data in the target system, performing what would traditionally require manual intervention without human involvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual modification of master data is performed, then some customization is achieved, but accuracy deteriorates due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization capabilityVSAvoiddeployment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables transaction data instances to autonomously resolve master data references through automated matching algorithms, eliminating manual data entry and modification. This self-service approach ensures consistent and accurate resolution of master data dependencies without human error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates validation mechanisms that provide feedback during the deployment process, verifying that placeholder references are correctly resolved against the target system's master data. This feedback loop ensures accuracy by detecting and preventing mismatches before they propagate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Speed

If transaction data is deployed without predictive validation, then deployment speed is maintained, but failure rate increases due to structural misalignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoiddeployment success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of transaction data instances against the target system's schema and master data structure before actual deployment. This pre-check identifies structural misalignments and missing master data references in advance, allowing corrections to be made without slowing down the overall deployment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by proactively identifying and preventing deployment failures through predictive validation. The system anticipates potential issues such as structural misalignment or missing master data and takes corrective action before deployment begins, thereby preventing failures rather than reacting to them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS12332851B1Generation of diverse simulated data
Publication Date: 2025.06.17 SAP SE
  • US12332851B1 patent drawing
  • US12332851B1 patent drawing
  • US12332851B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method include reception of a data object template comprising a plurality of fields and a respective value for each of the plurality of fields, determination of at least one master data-dependent field of the plurality of fields, generation of a plurality of data instances comprising the respective value for each of the plurality of fields except for the at least one master data-dependent field, where a value of the at least one master data-dependent field in each of the plurality of data instances is different from the respective value of the at least one master data-dependent field in the data object template, input of each of the plurality of data instances into a machine learning model to determine a likelihood of successful deployment for each of the plurality of data instances, and determination of a second plurality of data instances for deployment based on the determined likelihoods.