Transaction Modeling Engine for Objective Price Trend Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for assessing item transactions rely heavily on subjective interpretations and fail to capture the complexities of market dynamics, leading to inaccurate decision-making in buying or selling items.

Innovation Solution

A transaction engine that utilizes historical structured and unstructured data to model and predict item values, generating a transaction model based on observed prices and media content, and applies current data to forecast future price trends to inform transaction decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fundamental analysis and technical analysis are used to evaluate item value, then transaction decisions can be made based on historical data and expert judgment, but the accuracy and objectivity of value assessment deteriorates due to subjective interpretations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevalue assessment accuracyVSAvoidanalysis method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual fundamental analysis and technical analysis with an automated machine learning system. The transaction model automatically processes structured transaction data and unstructured media content to generate value predictions, eliminating subjective human interpretation while maintaining analytical depth. This substitution of mechanical analysis methods with an automated computational system resolves the contradiction between assessment accuracy and method complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms qualitative expert judgment and unstructured media content into quantitative parameters that can be processed by the machine learning model. By converting various data types into numerical features and feeding them into the transaction model, the system achieves objective and accurate value assessment without relying on subjective human analysis, thereby resolving the contradiction between precision and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If subjective interpretation methods are used for transaction evaluation, then analysis can be performed with simpler tools, but the reliability of transaction decisions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction decision reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces unreliable subjective interpretation with a reliable automated machine learning system. The transaction model consistently processes data according to learned patterns from historical transactions and media content, eliminating human bias and subjectivity. This substitution increases decision reliability while the modular system design keeps complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where the transaction model continuously learns from historical transaction outcomes and updates its predictions. This feedback loop improves reliability over time as the model refines its understanding of market dynamics, while the iterative learning process is managed through standardized machine learning workflows that control system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive data analysis is performed to capture market dynamics, then prediction accuracy improves, but the time required for transaction evaluation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprice prediction accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of both structured transaction data and unstructured media content before they are needed for prediction. The system pre-processes and stores cleaned, normalized data in ready-to-use formats, and the machine learning model is pre-trained on historical data. This preliminary action allows the system to generate accurate predictions quickly when transaction opportunities arise, resolving the contradiction between comprehensive analysis and evaluation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces time-consuming manual data analysis with automated machine learning processing. The transaction model rapidly analyzes comprehensive data including transaction history and media content using computational algorithms that process information much faster than human analysts, thereby achieving both high prediction accuracy and fast evaluation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Productivity

If manual analysis methods are used for item transactions, then system complexity remains low, but the productivity of transaction execution deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction execution speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual transaction analysis and execution with an automated machine learning system. The transaction model automatically evaluates opportunities and executes transactions based on its predictions, dramatically increasing productivity. The system complexity is managed through modular architecture and standardized machine learning workflows, making the complexity acceptable despite the automation gains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automated transaction execution where the machine learning model independently analyzes market conditions and executes transactions without human intervention. This self-service capability maximizes productivity by continuously monitoring and acting on transaction opportunities, while the automated nature of the process handles the complexity internally without requiring proportional human resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250390836A1Item transaction modeling engine systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 DELOREAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE LLC
  • US20250390836A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390836A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390836A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for item transactions including generating, based on structured transaction data indicative of values of an item over a time interval, a historical structured transaction dataset corresponding to the time interval, determining, based on the historical structured dataset, a set of historical directional values for the time interval; generating, based on unstructured transaction data comprising datasets published over the time interval, a historical unstructured transaction dataset corresponding to the time interval, determining numerical representations of the datasets; determining, based on the set of historical directional values and the numerical representations, a transaction model to determine a predicted direction of value for the item based on current structured and unstructured transaction data; determining, based on application of current structured and unstructured transaction data to the transaction model, a predicted direction of value for the item.