Transaction Data Environmental Impact Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current efforts to educate the public about environmental impacts have had limited success in changing behavior to positively affect the environment, indicating a need for innovative approaches to encourage sustainable transaction practices.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that analyzes transaction data to determine environmental impact scores over time, comparing scores to identify improvements and awarding users with a bonus for reduced negative environmental impact, utilizing a network with AI and machine learning to encourage sustainable behaviors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional environmental education methods are used to inform the public about environmental impacts, then public awareness of environmental issues is improved, but actual behavior change and sustainable transaction practices remain limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental awarenessVSAvoidbehavior change
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback by calculating environmental impact scores from transaction data and providing users with personalized reports showing their environmental footprint. This feedback loop transforms abstract environmental concepts into concrete, measurable metrics that users can understand and act upon, directly addressing the gap between awareness and behavior change

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically collecting transaction data, calculating environmental impact scores, and generating personalized environmental reports without requiring users to manually track or calculate their environmental footprint. This automation makes sustainable behavior monitoring easy and accessible, removing barriers to engagement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If the system monitors and analyzes detailed transaction data to calculate environmental impact scores, then measurement precision of environmental footprint is improved, but device complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impact score accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary layer that automatically collects, processes, and standardizes transaction data from multiple sources. This intermediary processing layer transforms raw transaction data into structured environmental impact metrics, enabling precise measurement without requiring users to directly manage the complexity of data collection and analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms complex transaction data into simplified environmental impact parameters and scores. By changing the representation from raw transaction details to standardized environmental metrics, the system achieves high measurement precision while presenting simplified information to users, effectively managing the complexity gap

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10915416B1System for environmental impact
Publication Date: 2021.02.09 VISA INTERNATIONAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION
  • US10915416B1 patent drawing
  • US10915416B1 patent drawing
  • US10915416B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The system and method may receive transaction data for a financial account associated with a user during a first time period and a second time period. A first environmental impact score for the transaction data associated with the user in the first time period may be determined and a second environmental impact score for the transaction data associated with the user in the second time period may also be determined. The first environmental impact score and the second environmental impact score may be compared. The system and method may determine whether there has been a change from the first environmental impact score to the second environmental impact score. In response to a determination that the second environmental impact score is less than the first environmental impact score; a bonus score may be determined for the user.