Transaction Flow Graph for Collaborative Fraud Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Traditional methods for detecting abnormal transactions in electronic payment processing networks often fail to identify complex security attacks, particularly collaborative frauds, as they treat individual transactions separately and struggle to connect transactions with shared financial or location attributes.
Innovation Solution
A system utilizing a transaction flow graph that connects transactions hierarchically, using two trees representing financial and location hierarchies, to aggregate small fraud values and detect abnormal activity in real-time without pre-training a model, enabling the identification of collaborative frauds.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If traditional supervised and unsupervised models are used to detect abnormal transactions, then individual transactions can be processed, but collaborative frauds involving multiple accounts cannot be detected
Solution Approach 1:
The patent combines multiple individual transaction analyses into a unified graph-based system that detects collaborative frauds. By merging transactions into a transaction flow graph where nodes represent accounts and edges represent transactions, the system can identify fraud patterns across multiple accounts that individual transaction analysis cannot detect.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transitions from analyzing transactions in one dimension (individual transaction attributes) to multiple dimensions by constructing a graph structure that adds relational dimensions. The graph framework incorporates financial hierarchy, location hierarchy, and temporal dimensions, enabling detection of complex fraud patterns that require multi-dimensional analysis.
2Device complexity
If transactions are treated separately in traditional models, then processing is simpler, but abnormal patterns across multiple transactions cannot be identified
Solution Approach 1:
The patent segments the complex fraud detection problem into hierarchical components: financial hierarchy (accounts, merchants, locations), location hierarchy (countries, cities, regions), and temporal hierarchy. This segmentation allows the system to manage complexity by breaking down the overall detection task into manageable hierarchical levels while maintaining the ability to detect cross-level patterns.
3Reliability
If hierarchical transaction flow graphs are used to detect collaborative frauds, then detection accuracy improves, but real-time processing becomes more challenging
Solution Approach 1:
The patent performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing the hierarchical graph structure and relationships between accounts, merchants, and locations before fraud detection is needed. The transaction flow graph is constructed with predefined financial and location hierarchies, allowing real-time fraud detection to focus on analyzing incoming transactions against the pre-built structure rather than building the structure itself in real-time.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer-readable media are provided for detecting security attacks based on transaction flow graphs. Other embodiments may be described and/or claimed.


