Transaction Flow Report Aggregation for Network Failure Detection
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In complex network environments, identifying the source of transaction failures across geographically dispersed network devices is challenging due to increased interoperability complexity and network latencies, leading to resource-intensive troubleshooting processes.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that generate transaction flow reports by aggregating status codes from multiple network devices, allowing for the identification of failed status codes and communication of alert messages to administrators, while inserting unique identifiers into network communications for tracking and reducing storage needs.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Area of stationary object
If network devices are geographically dispersed to expand enterprise network coverage, then network coverage and capacity are improved, but network latency and troubleshooting difficulty increase
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs preliminary actions by inserting unique identifiers into transaction requests before they traverse the network, and by pre-establishing the framework for collecting status codes from all network devices. This allows the system to have tracking infrastructure in place before failures occur, eliminating the need for reactive troubleshooting and reducing the time loss associated with geographic dispersion.
2Area of stationary object
If network devices are geographically dispersed, then network coverage is improved, but difficulty of detecting and measuring transaction failures increases
Solution Approach 1:
The system implements feedback by collecting status codes from each network device along the transaction path and feeding this information back to generate a comprehensive transaction flow report. This continuous feedback mechanism allows network administrators to easily detect and measure transaction failures regardless of geographic dispersion, as the system automatically aggregates and presents failure information from all devices in a centralized view.
3Quantity of substance
If traditional troubleshooting methods are used across multiple network devices, then resource utilization is high, but troubleshooting efficiency is low
Solution Approach 1:
The system applies self-service by automatically collecting status codes from network devices, generating transaction flow reports, and identifying failures without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by having network devices report their own status information, which is then automatically processed and analyzed. This eliminates the need for resource-intensive manual troubleshooting while significantly improving troubleshooting efficiency through automated failure detection and reporting.
Data Source
AI summary
In one embodiment, a system for troubleshooting transactions in a network environment includes an interface that may receive a transaction report from each of a number of network devices used to process a transaction. Each transaction report may include a status code field indicating a status of the transaction at each of the plurality of network devices. The system may also include a processor communicatively coupled to the interface. The processor may generate a transaction flow report that links each of the received transaction reports associated with the transaction. The processor may determine that the status code field associated with a first one of the plurality of network devices indicates a failed status. The processor may then communicate a status alert message to a network administrator associated with a first one of the plurality of network devices.