Transaction Services Hub Configuration Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current transaction services networks face challenges in providing secure, efficient, and customizable management and reporting capabilities for short-duration transactions, particularly in credit/debit card authorizations and other inquiry-response applications, lacking comprehensive configuration management and reporting tools for network administrators.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a transaction services hub that includes devices for managing transactions, providing users with a customizable user interface for configuring networks, storing configuration settings in a database, and offering advanced reporting and management tools, such as load balancing and failover services, to support secure and efficient transaction processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If comprehensive configuration management and reporting tools are implemented, then network administrators' capabilities are enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork administrators' capabilitiesVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into distinct functional modules including configuration management module, reporting module, user interface module, and database module. Each module handles specific tasks independently, allowing administrators to access only the features they need without being overwhelmed by the entire system's complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A web-based user interface acts as an intermediary between network administrators and the complex backend systems. This interface provides standardized, user-friendly access to configuration and reporting functions, shielding administrators from underlying system complexity while enhancing their operational capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If customizable user interface and configuration options are provided, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecustomizabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The user interface and configuration options are designed to be dynamically adjustable, allowing administrators to customize the system according to their specific needs. The interface can be adapted to different user roles, transaction types, and reporting requirements without requiring changes to the underlying system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides universal configuration options and reporting templates that can be applied across different transaction service scenarios. A single configurable framework supports multiple transaction types (credit/debit card authorizations, ATM activity, insurance verification, etc.) without requiring separate complex systems for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If secure transaction services are provided for multiple applications, then service versatility improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice versatilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transaction services hub provides a universal platform that handles multiple application types including credit/debit card authorizations, ATM activity, insurance verification, and home health monitoring. A single secure transaction processing framework supports all these diverse applications through standardized interfaces and protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Different transaction services are segmented into separate service modules that can be independently configured and managed. Each service type (payment processing, insurance verification, health monitoring) has its own processing logic while sharing common security and infrastructure components, reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9009221B2Transaction services management system
Publication Date: 2015.04.14 VERIZON PATENT & LICENSING INC
  • US9009221B2 patent drawing
  • US9009221B2 patent drawing
  • US9009221B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more network devices send to a user device a user interface with options for configuring a network to provide transaction services between transaction devices and host processing devices. The user interface is accessible to the user device via a private network connection. The one or more network devices receive from the user device configuration settings for a particular host processing device. The one or more network devices store the configuration settings in a database of transaction services data for multiple host processing devices, to be accessed by another device within the network for configuring the network for the particular host processing device.