Transaction Lifecycle Output for Payment Dispute Resolution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current process for managing transaction card disputes is manually intensive, resource-intensive, and costly, requiring precise management of supporting documents and involving high fees, complex rules, and substantial write-offs, which burdens retail banking operations and can lead to lost business if disputes are unresolved or mishandled.

Innovation Solution

A transaction lifecycle computer system that processes and generates a transaction lifecycle output by organizing authorization, clearing, and fraud data into pre-defined stages, providing a timeline and detailed data for each stage, thereby streamlining dispute resolution and reducing the need for multiple database inquiries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If transaction data is stored in separate databases operated by payment card network, then data security and operational independence are maintained, but dispute resolution time and operational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoiddispute resolution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates transaction data from multiple separate databases (authorization, clearing, fraud databases operated by different entities) into a single centralized dispute management system. This merging allows all relevant transaction data to be accessed and analyzed in one location, significantly reducing dispute resolution time while maintaining the operational independence of the underlying databases through secure data sharing protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The centralized dispute management system acts as an intermediary between the separate databases operated by payment card networks, issuers, and acquirers. It collects, integrates, and manages transaction data from these independent sources, providing a neutral platform for dispute resolution that maintains the operational independence and security of each participant's database while enabling efficient cross-entity collaboration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual processes are used for managing supporting documents in disputes, then flexibility in handling complex cases is maintained, but resource consumption and operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling flexibilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The dispute management system enables automated self-service capabilities where issuers and acquirers can independently upload, organize, and manage their own supporting documents and transaction data. The system automatically correlates this data with information from other participants, reducing the need for manual intervention while maintaining the flexibility to handle complex dispute scenarios through automated workflow management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary organization and correlation of transaction data and supporting documents before disputes are formally initiated. By pre-integrating data from authorization, clearing, and fraud databases, and by providing centralized access to all relevant transaction information in advance, the system reduces the manual workload during actual dispute resolution while maintaining adaptability for complex cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If multiple services are contacted to obtain transaction data for different stages, then comprehensive data collection is achieved, but operational burden and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidoperational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The centralized dispute management system provides universal access to all types of transaction data (authorization, clearing, fraud information) from multiple sources through a single interface. It performs multiple functions including data collection, integration, validation, and presentation in one consolidated platform, eliminating the need for issuers and acquirers to contact multiple separate services while ensuring complete transaction data is available for dispute resolution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS10915907B2Methods and systems for generating a transaction lifecycle output for a payment card transaction
Publication Date: 2021.02.09 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US10915907B2 patent drawing
  • US10915907B2 patent drawing
  • US10915907B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for generating a transaction lifecycle output using a transaction lifecycle (TL) computer system are provided herein. The TL computer system includes a memory device for storing data and a processor in communication with the memory device. The processor is programmed to receive transaction data associated with a transaction being processed over a payment network. The transaction data includes authorization data, clearing data, and fraud data. The processor is also programmed to generate the transaction lifecycle output by processing the authorization data, the clearing data, and the fraud data. The transaction lifecycle output includes output data organized by pre-defined stages of the transaction.