Transaction Load Modeling for High-Volume Performance Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current financial instrument trading systems face challenges in verifying and evaluating performance under heavy loads of actual production data, leading to potential errors and failures during high trading volumes.

Innovation Solution

A configurable and scalable transaction rate input model is used to simulate historical transaction input rates, applying multipliers to amplify load values and inject actual production data elements into the system to evaluate performance accurately.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If actual production data is used to evaluate system performance under heavy loads, then measurement precision is improved, but system reliability deteriorates due to potential errors and failures during high trading volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance evaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem stability under load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by organizing and preparing production data elements in advance into a contiguous set before evaluation. The system sections the data into portions, determines data element counts for each portion, and prepares the data for amplified loading before actually subjecting the transaction processing system to heavy loads. This pre-preparation ensures that when high-volume testing occurs, the data is already structured and ready, preventing evaluation errors while maintaining system stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses copying by creating a controlled evaluation environment that replicates production conditions without using actual production data during the test. The system organizes production data elements into a contiguous set and sections them into portions for amplified loading, effectively creating a copy of production data structures that can be safely manipulated and amplified without risking actual production system integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If transaction load is increased to simulate real-world conditions, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases due to need for data organization and amplification mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance verification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the contiguous set of production data elements into multiple portions. Each portion is assigned a specific number of data elements determined by sectioning the original set. This segmentation allows the system to manage large volumes of data in manageable chunks, applying amplification factors to each portion separately while maintaining overall measurement precision without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamics by making the data organization structure adaptable and configurable. The system allows configurable amplification factors that can be adjusted based on evaluation needs, and the data portions can be dynamically assigned different amplification levels. This dynamic approach enables precise control over load intensity without requiring a completely rigid complex infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If production data is organized and amplified for evaluation, then productivity is improved through controlled testing, but loss of time increases due to data preparation and organization processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem evaluation efficiencyVSAvoiddata preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by organizing production data elements into a contiguous set and sectioning them into portions before the actual evaluation process. This pre-organization happens once, and the prepared data structure can then be reused for multiple evaluations with different amplification factors, significantly reducing the time needed for subsequent testing while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universality by creating a data organization structure that serves multiple evaluation purposes. The contiguous set of production data elements, once organized and sectioned, can be used for various types of performance evaluations with different amplification factors and configurations. This multi-functional data structure eliminates the need to reorganize data for each evaluation scenario, reducing time loss while maintaining evaluation productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12530720B2Transaction processing system performance evaluation
Publication Date: 2026.01.20 CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE INC
  • US12530720B2 patent drawing
  • US12530720B2 patent drawing
  • US12530720B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transaction evaluation system may include a configurable and/or scalable transaction rate input model which models historical and/or recent transaction input rate patterns of a transaction processing system for a specified time period with configurable and/or scalable transactional amplitude for use in evaluating performance of the transaction processing system. The system may operate to inject particular volumes of transactions into the transaction processing system at specific times and/or periods of time.