Personalized Transaction Mode Recommendation Engine

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in finding the best transaction mode for product purchases due to disparate and unobvious savings information across various online and offline channels, often requiring extensive research and leading to potential missed savings opportunities.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing software robotics process automation and natural language processing to automatically gather product data, detect inconsistencies, and generate personalized transaction mode recommendations using a custom machine learning model, combining transaction channels and financial instruments tailored to individual user preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If users manually search for transaction modes across multiple channels, then they can find savings information, but it requires extensive time and effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesavings informationVSAvoidsearch time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically collects and analyzes transaction data from multiple channels without user intervention. Software robotics autonomously scrape product data, compare prices, and generate recommendations, allowing the system to serve itself in gathering and processing information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual mechanical search processes are replaced with automated software robotics and machine learning models. The system uses NLP models to parse unstructured data and ML algorithms to generate personalized recommendations, substituting human effort with automated computational processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Loss of information

If users manually research transaction modes, then they can understand savings details, but it requires extensive research effort

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction information completenessVSAvoidresearch effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system autonomously collects comprehensive transaction information from multiple sources including online and offline channels. Software robotics automatically aggregate data without requiring users to manually research each channel, and the system self-updates information in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary data collection, validation, and analysis before the user needs it. Transaction information is pre-processed and stored in a standardized format, so when users query for recommendations, the heavy lifting of information gathering and initial analysis has already been completed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If transaction information is presented in detail, then users can make informed decisions, but the information becomes complex and overwhelming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoidinformation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides different levels of information detail tailored to individual user needs and preferences. The NLP model analyzes user queries and adapts the presentation format, providing comprehensive details when needed but simplified summaries when appropriate, rather than presenting the same complex information to all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning recommendation system acts as an intermediary between raw transaction data and user decision-making. It processes complex multi-channel transaction information and translates it into simplified, actionable recommendations, filtering out noise and presenting only the most relevant savings opportunities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of information

If users search for best transaction modes, then they can maximize savings, but they may miss opportunities due to time constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesavings opportunitiesVSAvoidsearch duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors and updates transaction information from multiple channels in real-time. Software robotics continuously scrape and validate data, ensuring that savings information is always current without requiring users to repeatedly search. The recommendation system continuously learns and adapts to provide up-to-date suggestions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-calculates and pre-presents recommended transaction modes before users make purchasing decisions. By having the recommendation engine ready with personalized suggestions based on real-time data, users don't need to spend time searching when they're ready to purchase - the best options are already identified and presented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230281693A1Method for generating personalized recommendation by optimizing transaction mode for a product search
Publication Date: 2023.09.07 SAVEAZY DIGITAL SOLUTIONS PTE LTD
  • US20230281693A1 patent drawing
  • US20230281693A1 patent drawing
  • US20230281693A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a method for generating personalized recommendation by optimizing transaction mode for a product search is fulfilled in the ongoing description by (a) automatically obtaining products data from disparate product sources using software robotics process automation, (b) extracting contextual attributes using a natural language processing model based on a composite and contextual matching technique, (c) dynamically updating the products data by detecting inconsistency using software robotics defect detection, (d) obtaining, from user devices, a search query for a product, (e) generating a recommendation of transaction mode for the product using a custom machine learning model, wherein the transaction mode is a combination of the transaction channel and a financial instrument of the user and the recommendation is personalized based on partial information of financial instruments of the user, and (f) representing the recommendation for optimizing search of transaction mode for the product.