Transaction Processing Node Scaling for Variable Authorization Demand

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing transaction systems face challenges in matching computing resources to variable demand levels, particularly in authorization processes, leading to inconsistent performance and difficulty in supporting local processes effectively.

Innovation Solution

A computing apparatus with a transaction processing management node that installs and manages transaction processing nodes, utilizing an in-memory database and a master node for centralized control and rule management, allowing dynamic scaling and resource allocation based on demand.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If computing resources are increased to meet peak demand, then transaction processing performance is improved, but system cost and resource waste increase during normal or low demand periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction processing performanceVSAvoidcomputing resources
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the number of transaction processing nodes based on real-time demand thresholds. When demand exceeds a threshold, additional nodes are deployed; when demand drops below a threshold, nodes are removed. This dynamic scaling allows the system to maintain high performance during peak loads while reducing computing resource consumption during normal or low demand periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the quantity of processing nodes as a variable parameter in response to demand conditions. By monitoring demand thresholds and adjusting node deployment accordingly, the system optimizes the balance between processing capability and resource utilization, preventing both over-provisioning and under-provisioning of computing resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If more transaction processing nodes are deployed, then processing capacity is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing capacityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transaction processing system is segmented into multiple independent nodes that can be deployed, scaled, and managed separately. Each node handles a portion of the transaction load and can be independently configured. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high processing capacity through parallel nodes while managing complexity through modular architecture and automated management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated node deployment, load balancing, and resource management capabilities. When additional nodes are needed, the system automatically provisions and configures them without manual intervention. This self-service approach increases processing capacity while preventing complexity from escalating due to manual configuration and management overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Stability of the object's composition

If centralized control is implemented, then rule management consistency is improved, but responsiveness to local demand fluctuations decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverule management consistencyVSAvoidresponse speed to local demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements differentiated control qualities at different levels: centralized control for rule management ensures consistency across all nodes, while decentralized control for node deployment and local processing allows rapid response to demand fluctuations. Each node can autonomously adjust its operation based on local conditions while adhering to centralized rules, achieving both consistency and responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260037941A1Transaction control management
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 MASTERCARD INT INC
  • US20260037941A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037941A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037941A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of performing transaction processing operations at computing apparatus is provided, together with computing apparatus adapted to manage these operations. The computing apparatus includes a programmed processor adapted to provide the following functional elements. A transaction processing management node is adapted to install and deinstall transaction processing nodes. A transaction operation rules database holds transaction operation rules. An interface to a transaction processing infrastructure receives transaction data for the transaction processing operations. The transaction processing nodes are adapted to perform the transaction processing operation on the transaction data using the transaction operation rules under control of the transaction processing management node.