Transaction Pattern Generation for Accounting Error Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Accounting systems face challenges in accurately classifying transactions, leading to misclassifications that can affect financial reporting and decision-making, as existing methods lack efficient mechanisms for identifying and correcting errors across different clients and accountants.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for correcting misclassified transactions by generating a pattern based on a change in account classification, which can be applied to identify and suggest corrections for potentially misclassified transactions across different clients and accountants, utilizing a user interface and accounting engine to facilitate the process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If accountants manually review and revise transaction files for each client, then classification accuracy can be improved, but the time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction classification accuracyVSAvoidtime for reviewing and revising transactions
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of transactions using automated rules and patterns before the accountant receives the file. This preliminary action pre-processes the transactions, so that when the accountant reviews the file, much of the classification work has already been done, reducing the time required while maintaining accuracy through subsequent accountant verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

When accountants correct misclassified transactions, the system learns from these corrections and updates its classification patterns. This feedback mechanism allows the system to improve its accuracy over time, reducing the need for extensive manual review while maintaining or improving classification precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If accountants thoroughly review each transaction classification, then errors can be detected, but productivity decreases due to the manual nature of the process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial reporting accuracyVSAvoidnumber of transactions reviewed per accountant per time period
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary automated classification layer between the transaction data and the accountant's review. This intermediary performs initial sorting and classification using learned patterns, allowing accountants to focus their expertise on verifying and correcting only the problematic transactions rather than manually reviewing every single transaction from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a copy of the transaction file with preliminary classifications applied, allowing the accountant to work with this preprocessed version rather than the raw data. This copying approach enables parallel processing where automated classification occurs while the accountant prepares for review, effectively increasing throughput without sacrificing thoroughness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If the system applies corrections from one client to another using patterns, then efficiency improves, but the risk of propagating errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of correcting transactions across multiple clientsVSAvoidaccuracy of pattern-based corrections
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from accountant corrections to continuously refine and validate patterns. When patterns are applied across clients, the system monitors correction outcomes and adjusts patterns based on actual performance, ensuring that efficiency gains from pattern-matching do not compromise accuracy. Incorrect patterns are automatically refined based on accountant interventions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-validation of patterns before applying them to new clients. It automatically tests patterns against historical data and monitors their performance, allowing the system to self-correct and improve pattern accuracy without requiring manual verification of each pattern application, thus maintaining both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10515339B1Error correction system for accountants
Publication Date: 2019.12.24 INTUIT INC
  • US10515339B1 patent drawing
  • US10515339B1 patent drawing
  • US10515339B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for error correction of a first misclassified transaction that includes receiving a request to correct the first misclassified transaction. The first misclassified transaction is associated with a first client accounting data store of a first client. The first misclassified transaction is associated with a first account, and the request is to change the first account to a second account. The method further includes generating a pattern for account correction based on the request, and applying the pattern to transactions to identify a second misclassified transaction. The transactions are associated with a second client accounting data store of a second client. The method further includes presenting a suggestion of a modification of the second misclassified transaction based on the pattern, and receiving an acceptance of the suggestion.