Unified Transaction Pipeline for Consistent Multi-Instrument Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Institutions face inefficiencies and inconsistencies when processing complex, inter-related transactions for different financial instruments using separate systems and software programs, which prevents new products from being programmed on a universal system.

Innovation Solution

A unified system comprising a receiver, transaction interpreter, rollup interpreter, and rules interpreter processes transactions by retrieving instrument data, applying transactions, aggregating states, and applying rules to generate final states for database commitment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate systems and software programs are used for each financial instrument, then each instrument can be processed with dedicated functionality, but system complexity increases and consistency between interrelated transactions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency between interrelated transactionsVSAvoidnumber of separate systems
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate transaction processing systems into a single unified processing core that handles diverse financial instruments (securities, derivatives, cash instruments) through a common architecture. This consolidation eliminates inconsistencies between interrelated transactions while reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The processing core implements a universal transaction processing framework that can handle multiple instrument types and transaction kinds through configurable processing rules and state machines. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to replace multiple dedicated systems while maintaining consistency across all instrument types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If a single universal system is used for all financial instruments, then system complexity is reduced and consistency is improved, but adaptability to new products and specific instrument requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of separate systemsVSAvoidability to program new products
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The processing core employs dynamic, configurable processing rules and state transition definitions that can be modified without changing the underlying system architecture. This allows the universal system to adapt to new financial products and instrument types by simply configuring new rules and states rather than developing new systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter-driven configuration where processing behavior is determined by configurable parameters, rules, and state definitions specific to each instrument type. This allows the same processing core to handle diverse instruments by changing parameters and rules rather than requiring dedicated systems for each instrument.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple separate systems are used for different instruments, then specific instrument requirements can be met, but processing efficiency and interoperability between interrelated transactions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of instrument-specific processingVSAvoidtransaction processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The processing core segments transaction processing into distinct, modular components: transaction interpretation, state determination, rule evaluation, and action execution. Each component handles specific aspects of processing independently, allowing efficient parallel processing while maintaining instrument-specific accuracy through configurable rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing core that acts as a mediator between various financial instruments and the underlying processing engine. This intermediary layer translates diverse instrument-specific requirements into a unified processing language, enabling efficient processing while maintaining accuracy for each instrument type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12536032B2Pipeline for processing transactions
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12536032B2 patent drawing
  • US12536032B2 patent drawing
  • US12536032B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A banking pipeline for processing various transactions for multiple financial instruments is disclosed herein. The pipeline may have three distinct interpreters, a transaction interpreter, a rollup interpreter, and a rules interpreter. Different aspects of the transaction may be performed on separate interpreters and each interpreter may perform its aspect of the transaction before the next interpreter begins.