Unified Transaction Pooling for Multi-Account Purchasing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Financial institutions' existing systems limit users' purchasing power across multiple transaction accounts, restricting purchases and failing to maximize benefits offered by individual accounts, as users can only spend up to the limit of a single account, leading to insufficient funds for transactions.

Innovation Solution

The system allows users to split transactions across multiple accounts based on their global purchasing capacity, enabling increased purchasing power for individual accounts by reallocating funds from higher-capacity accounts, thereby overcoming the limitations of individual account balances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If users are limited to spending only up to the limit of a single transaction account, then individual account management is simplified, but users cannot make purchases exceeding individual account limits even when sufficient funds exist across multiple accounts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepurchasing powerVSAvoidtransaction management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system combines multiple transaction accounts into a unified purchasing pool, allowing users to access the aggregate purchasing power across all accounts. When a purchase is made, the system automatically or manually allocates funds from appropriate accounts, merging the functionality of multiple accounts into a single transaction interface while maintaining individual account tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The transaction management system provides multi-functionality by supporting both traditional single-account transactions and multi-account pooled transactions. The system can operate in different modes: traditional mode where each account is independent, and enhanced mode where accounts are pooled together, giving users flexibility to choose based on their needs while using the same underlying infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple transaction accounts are treated as separate accounts, then account security and risk isolation are maintained, but users cannot maximize benefits or make large purchases by combining funds across accounts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction flexibilityVSAvoidfund allocation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-establishing allocation rules and preferences before transactions occur. Users can set up automatic allocation rules that specify which accounts should be used for different types of transactions or spending scenarios. This preliminary configuration eliminates the need for manual fund allocation during actual transactions, making the process as easy as traditional single-account usage while enabling multi-account flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer between the user and multiple transaction accounts. This intermediary automatically manages fund allocation across accounts based on predefined rules, user preferences, or real-time account balances. Users interact with a simplified interface while the intermediary handles the complexity of multi-account coordination, maintaining ease of operation while enabling advanced functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240412218A1Enhanced financial account management and transaction capabilities
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES CO INC
  • US20240412218A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412218A1 patent drawing
  • US20240412218A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed are various embodiments for enhancing financial capabilities of transaction accounts. A user could request a modified purchasing power or request to split a transaction between a plurality of transaction accounts. First, the global purchasing capacity is calculated. Next, the risk exposure is calculated based at least in part on a risk profile and the global purchasing capacity. Next, a respective purchasing power of a transaction account is modified. The modification of the respective purchasing power could cause the global purchasing capacity to be recalculated. Next, the user is notified of the modified purchasing power. In some instances, the purchasing power could be modified by splitting the transaction between the plurality of transaction accounts or between a first transaction account and a second transaction account.