Transaction Risk Evaluation for Resource-Limited Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Resource-limited devices in financial networks lack the capability to evaluate transaction risk effectively due to insufficient storage and processing resources, making it difficult for them to analyze large datasets and derive risk factors for potential transactions.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that generates a transaction graph from financial network data, allowing resource-limited devices to receive transaction-risk data from a server, which aggregates risk attributes of counterparty nodes and their connections, enabling local risk evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If resource-limited devices perform local risk evaluation, then evaluation capability is improved, but device complexity and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction risk evaluation capabilityVSAvoidprocessing requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A centralized server acts as an intermediary that performs complex risk evaluation computations and provides simplified risk assessments to resource-limited devices. The server receives transaction data, analyzes it against stored risk profiles and network graphs, and returns evaluation results that device can use without performing the complex analysis itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The risk evaluation system is segmented into two parts: a centralized server that handles complex computations and data processing, and resource-limited devices that perform simple local evaluations using provided risk profiles. This division allows each component to operate within its resource constraints while achieving overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If devices store and process large transaction datasets, then risk analysis accuracy is improved, but storage capacity requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk analysis accuracyVSAvoidstorage capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The server serves as an intermediary that stores and processes large transaction datasets, maintaining comprehensive risk profiles and network graphs. Resource-limited devices query this centralized database for specific risk information needed for their transactions, avoiding the need to store extensive datasets locally while maintaining accurate risk analysis capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts only the necessary risk information from large datasets and stores it in condensed risk profiles and network graphs on the server. Devices retrieve only the specific risk data relevant to their transactions rather than storing complete transaction histories, reducing storage requirements while maintaining analysis accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of operation

If devices independently evaluate all transaction risks, then evaluation independence is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation independenceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The server performs preliminary risk evaluation actions by pre-processing transaction data, building risk profiles, and constructing network graphs before actual transactions occur. When a transaction is attempted, the device simply queries pre-computed risk information rather than performing comprehensive analysis in real-time, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining independent evaluation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The server acts as an intermediary that performs computationally intensive risk analysis in advance and provides pre-computed results to devices. This allows devices to maintain evaluation independence by using provided risk profiles while avoiding the time-consuming process of analyzing entire transaction datasets from scratch for each transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20240144274A9Transaction-risk evaluation by resource-limited devices
Publication Date: 2024.05.02 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US20240144274A9 patent drawing
  • US20240144274A9 patent drawing
  • US20240144274A9 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for enabling transaction-risk evaluation by resource-limited devices. The method includes receiving from a financial network transaction data, defining transactions in the network, and generating, based on the transaction data, a transaction graph comprising nodes, representing parties to transactions, interconnected by edges representing transactions between parties represented by the nodes. For each of at least some nodes, at least one risk attribute provided in the transaction graph. The method includes receiving from a resource-limited device a request describing a potential transaction, identifying at least one counterparty node, deriving transaction-risk data, dependent on aggregated risk attributes of the counterparty node and a selected set of nodes reachable from that node via edges, and sending to the device a response comprising the transaction-risk data for evaluation of risk of the potential transaction.