Transaction Routing Model for Real-Time Multi-Network Payments

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic transaction systems face inefficiencies due to fragmented processing systems, security risks, and increased costs, leading to poor user experience and unreliable transactions across multiple payment networks.

Innovation Solution

A unified transaction processor system that utilizes a single API, intelligent payment routing, and orchestration capabilities to facilitate real-time electronic transactions, ensuring compliance with global security standards and providing a single management portal for seamless execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a unified transaction processor system is implemented, then transaction efficiency and security are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments transaction processing into distinct functional modules including a routing system for path determination, a data query system for configuration retrieval, and a transaction event-topic stream for event handling. This modular segmentation allows each component to specialize in specific security and processing tasks, improving overall reliability while managing complexity through clear separation of concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The routing system acts as an intermediary between the user and multiple transaction networks, mediating all transaction requests through a centralized decision-making point. This intermediary approach ensures uniform security protocols and routing logic are applied across all transactions, enhancing reliability while abstracting the underlying complexity from end users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If intelligent payment routing is used, then transaction speed is improved, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction speedVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring routing rules and transaction parameters in the data query system before actual transactions occur. The routing system retrieves pre-established routing configurations and applies them automatically during transaction processing, enabling fast real-time routing decisions without complex real-time calculations, thus improving speed while managing processing complexity through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the routing system continuously monitors transaction outcomes and network performance, adjusting routing configurations based on observed patterns. This feedback loop enables the system to learn and optimize routing paths over time, improving transaction speed through experience while automating the complexity of adaptive decision-making rather than requiring manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple transaction networks are integrated, then system versatility is improved, but operational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork compatibilityVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system is designed with universal functionality to handle multiple types of transaction networks and routing scenarios through a single unified interface. It can process various transaction types, apply different routing strategies, and interact with multiple networks using consistent logic and data structures, thereby improving versatility while preventing operational complexity from increasing proportionally with the number of supported networks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages operational complexity by parameterizing network configurations and routing rules, allowing flexible adaptation to different networks through configuration parameters rather than hard-coded logic. The data query system stores and manages these parameters, enabling the routing system to adapt to new networks by loading appropriate parameters without modifying the core routing logic, thus improving versatility while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12561654B2Systems and methods for executing real-time electronic transactions using a routing decision model
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 WORLDPAY LLC
  • US12561654B2 patent drawing
  • US12561654B2 patent drawing
  • US12561654B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods of executing a real-time electronic transaction by a real-time transaction system are disclosed. One method includes receiving, by a routing system, an electronic transaction request from a user. The routing system may receive routing configuration data from a data query system. The routing system may determine an optimal path for executing the electronic transaction request in accordance with a routing decision model and the routing configuration data. The routing system may transmit the electronic transaction request to a transaction network via the optimal path. The routing system may generate a transaction route data based on the optimal path. The routing system may transmit the transaction route data to a transaction event-topic stream.