Transaction Validation via Risk-Based Scoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Online transaction processing systems face challenges in mitigating fraudulent activities, as existing methods lack effective mechanisms to differentiate between legitimate and fraudulent transactions based on prior transaction data.

Innovation Solution

A transaction processing system that utilizes cookies stored in user devices to obtain outcome data from prior transactions, determining the appropriate transaction process by matching the data with predefined score ranges, and applying corresponding validation processes to assess and manage transactions accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If all transactions are subjected to comprehensive validation processes, then transaction security is improved, but processing time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction securityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different validation processes to different transactions based on their risk characteristics. High-risk transactions receive comprehensive validation including device fingerprinting, velocity checks, and fraud scoring, while low-risk transactions undergo minimal or no validation. This localized approach to security ensures thorough scrutiny where needed while maintaining fast processing for legitimate transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary risk assessment by analyzing device fingerprints, transaction history, and velocity data before the main validation process. This preliminary action identifies high-risk transactions that require comprehensive validation, allowing the system to prepare appropriate validation pathways in advance and avoid applying full validation to all transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If comprehensive validation processes are applied to all transactions, then fraud detection capability is improved, but device complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The validation system is segmented into multiple independent modules including device fingerprinting, velocity checking, fraud scoring, and challenge-response mechanisms. Each module operates independently and can be selectively applied based on transaction risk. This segmentation allows the system to maintain comprehensive fraud detection capabilities while avoiding the complexity of a monolithic validation system by only activating necessary modules for each transaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the validation process based on real-time risk assessment. The validation pathway is not fixed but changes according to transaction characteristics, device reputation, and detected anomalies. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain high fraud detection capability while adapting complexity levels to match actual risk, avoiding unnecessary complexity for low-risk transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If minimal validation is applied to transactions, then processing efficiency is improved, but fraud risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidfraud risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors transaction outcomes and fraud patterns, using this feedback to refine risk assessment models and adjust validation strategies. Feedback from detected fraud cases improves the accuracy of risk prediction, allowing the system to maintain high processing efficiency for legitimate transactions while identifying and applying appropriate validation to potentially fraudulent transactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary risk assessment layer that sits between transaction submission and validation processing. This intermediary evaluates transaction risk using device fingerprints, velocity data, and fraud scoring, then routes transactions to appropriate validation pathways. This intermediary mechanism enables the system to maintain high processing efficiency for low-risk transactions while ensuring adequate fraud protection through selective application of validation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20230050176A1Method of processing a transaction request
Publication Date: 2023.02.16 AFTERPAY CORP SERVICES PTY LTD
  • US20230050176A1 patent drawing
  • US20230050176A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A transaction processing system is arranged to receive, from a user device, transaction data and outcome data associated with outcomes of one or more previous transactions. Based on the transaction data and the outcome data, the transaction processing system may process the transaction request according to a particular transaction process and update the outcome data. The updated outcome data may be sent to the user device and stored for use in processing a future transaction.