Machine-Learning Warehouse Recommendations by Transaction Zone

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals and smaller entities lack access to warehouse space and are unable to determine optimal locations for warehousing their inventory to be closer to buyers, as conventional systems do not provide adequate solutions for these entities.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model is trained using transaction histories to predict transaction zones and recommend warehouse spaces based on item attributes, allowing individuals and smaller entities to access and utilize suitable warehouse locations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If large third-party vendors make their warehouse space available to other large entities, then warehouse space utilization is improved, but access for individuals and smaller entities deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarehouse space utilizationVSAvoidaccessibility to different entity sizes
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the warehouse space into different zones or areas that can be allocated to entities of varying sizes. Instead of treating all warehouse space as a single large entity resource, the system divides it into manageable portions that individuals and smaller entities can access, while still maintaining overall high utilization through efficient allocation across multiple users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The warehouse management system is designed to serve multiple types of entities simultaneously - large entities, small entities, and individuals. The system provides universal access by implementing a unified platform that handles diverse user needs through a single interface, allowing the same infrastructure to benefit entities of all sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If conventional warehousing systems are used, then large entities can store inventory, but individuals and smaller entities cannot determine optimal locations or access warehouse space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinventory storage capabilityVSAvoidlocation determination and access
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service functionality by automatically determining optimal warehouse locations for individuals and smaller entities based on their inventory characteristics and delivery requirements. The automated location recommendation engine eliminates the need for manual planning, allowing users to simply input their needs and receive optimized warehouse assignments without requiring specialized knowledge or manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual warehouse location planning and access coordination with an automated digital system. Instead of relying on manual processes for determining optimal locations and coordinating access, the system uses algorithms and data processing to automatically match inventory with appropriate warehouse spaces, significantly simplifying the operation for all users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If warehouse space is allocated without optimization, then access is simplified, but shipping times increase and space utilization decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarehouse allocation simplicityVSAvoidshipping time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary optimization by determining the optimal warehouse location in advance, before the actual shipping process begins. By pre-calculating the best warehouse assignment based on inventory type, destination, and historical data, the system ensures that items are stored in locations that will minimize future shipping times, rather than making ad-hoc decisions that may not be optimal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that continuously monitor shipping performance and warehouse utilization. By analyzing actual shipping times and space usage patterns, the system refines its location recommendations over time, learning from past performance to improve future allocations. This feedback loop ensures that simplicity in allocation does not compromise shipping efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12462223B2System and method for providing warehousing service
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 EBAY INC
  • US12462223B2 patent drawing
  • US12462223B2 patent drawing
  • US12462223B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for providing warehousing services that utilize a machine learning model are provided. The system trains a machine learning model with training data comprising item attributes and transaction locations extracted from past transactions for each item category to identify a plurality of transaction zones where each item category has a highest probability for selling. Subsequently, the system receives a warehouse request to warehouse inventory in a remote location. At least one transaction zone is determined based on item attributes of the inventory by applying the trained machine learning model. Based on the determined at least one transaction zone, the system determines one or more warehouse spaces that satisfy a spacing requirement for the inventory and causes presentation of the warehouse recommendation. The warehouse recommendation can indicate the one or more warehouse spaces.