Transactional Complexity Evaluation for Human-Machine Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional approaches fail to accurately evaluate the complexity of processes involving humans and computer systems, as they do not consider humans as part of the system during the evaluation process.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that determine the complexity of transactions by calculating the natural log of the inverse product of success probabilities from state diagrams associated with both human and computer system entities, incorporating empirical observations for human state transition probabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional structural, informational, or descriptive complexity formulae are used, then the complexity of non-human processes can be determined, but they cannot evaluate processes involving humans in the loop

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity evaluation accuracyVSAvoidapplicability to human-in-the-loop processes
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the human-in-the-loop process into distinct components: human actions, system actions, and their interactions. By creating separate state diagrams for human and system entities and evaluating their probabilities independently, then combining them through the transactional complexity formula, the method achieves both measurement precision for each component and versatility for the overall human-system process evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If designers use rough estimates of complexity, then design decisions can be made quickly, but the accuracy of complexity evaluation is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedesign decision speedVSAvoidcomplexity estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-defining state diagrams, transition probabilities, and the transactional complexity formula before actual design evaluation. This framework allows designers to quickly evaluate multiple design alternatives using the established mathematical model, maintaining both speed and accuracy. The state diagrams and probability assignments are prepared in advance, enabling rapid calculation when design decisions need to be made.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7797262B2Method and apparatus for evaluating the complexity of human-in-the-loop processes
Publication Date: 2010.09.14 ORACLE AMERICAN INC
  • US7797262B2 patent drawing
  • US7797262B2 patent drawing
  • US7797262B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One embodiment of the present invention provides a system that determines the complexity of a transaction between a first entity and a second entity. The system starts by determining a first probability of success for a portion of the transaction which is associated with actions of the first entity. The system then determines a second probability of success for a portion of the transaction which is associated with actions of the second entity. The system next calculates a transactional complexity for the transaction based on the first probability of success and the second probability of success.