Transactional Execution Status Testing Logic

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of cores and logical processors in integrated circuits leads to bottlenecks in data synchronization, particularly due to lock contention and deadlocks, which complicates programming and reduces performance in multi-threaded environments.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of instructions and logic to test transactional execution status using Transactional Synchronization Extensions (TSX), including Hardware Lock Elision (HLE) and Restricted Transactional Memory (RTM), which allow for dynamic detection of serialization needs and execution of transactional regions, reducing the need for locks and minimizing conflicts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If locks are used to guarantee mutual exclusion for shared data access, then data consistency is ensured, but thread concurrency is reduced due to serialization and lock contention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata consistencyVSAvoidthread concurrency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the shared data structure into multiple independent lockable regions or entries. Instead of locking the entire data structure, individual entries or regions can be locked independently, allowing multiple threads to access different segments concurrently. This reduces lock contention and serialization while maintaining data consistency within each segmented region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary validation mechanism that checks whether a lock is actually needed before acquiring it. This intermediary layer determines if the accessed data is currently being modified by another thread, and only acquires the lock if necessary. This reduces unnecessary lock acquisitions and allows more concurrent read-only accesses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the entire hash table is locked to ensure data consistency, then data validity is maintained, but throughput and performance of other threads are adversely affected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validityVSAvoidthread throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the hash table into multiple independent segments or buckets, each with its own lock. When a thread needs to access the hash table, it only acquires the lock for the specific segment it needs, not the entire table. This allows other threads to simultaneously access different segments, maintaining data validity within each segment while maximizing overall thread throughput.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different locking strategies to different parts of the hash table based on local access patterns. Frequently accessed or modified segments can have more granular locking, while read-only segments can use coarser-grained or no locking. This local optimization ensures data validity where needed while maximizing throughput in other regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If multiple locks are acquired for fine-grain synchronization in hash table entries, then concurrency is improved, but deadlock risk and programming complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconcurrencyVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent establishes a predetermined global ordering or hierarchy for acquiring multiple locks. Threads are required to acquire locks in this predefined order, which eliminates the possibility of circular wait conditions and deadlocks. This preliminary establishment of lock acquisition rules maintains high concurrency while reducing programming complexity by providing clear, standardized guidelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a lock validation mechanism that provides feedback to threads about the current state of locks and potential deadlock risks. Before acquiring a lock, the system checks whether doing so would create a deadlock condition based on the current lock hierarchy and thread state. This feedback mechanism prevents deadlock while maintaining concurrency by guiding threads to acquire locks safely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10261879B2Instruction and logic to test transactional execution status
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 INTEL CORP
  • US10261879B2 patent drawing
  • US10261879B2 patent drawing
  • US10261879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Novel instructions, logic, methods and apparatus are disclosed to test transactional execution status. Embodiments include decoding a first instruction to start a transactional region. Responsive to the first instruction, a checkpoint for a set of architecture state registers is generated and memory accesses from a processing element in the transactional region associated with the first instruction are tracked. A second instruction to detect transactional execution of the transactional region is then decoded. An operation is executed, responsive to decoding the second instruction, to determine if an execution context of the second instruction is within the transactional region. Then responsive to the second instruction, a first flag is updated. In some embodiments, a register may optionally be updated and/or a second flag may optionally be updated responsive to the second instruction.