Transactional Memory Abort Control for Multiprocessor Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In multiprocessor computing environments with transactional memory, frequent transactional aborts due to conflicting memory accesses and limited resources lead to inefficiency and wasted cycles, as existing solutions like fine-grained locking and hardware Transactional Memory (TM) face challenges in scalability and error-prone implementation.

Innovation Solution

A method is introduced where a first processing thread can initiate an abort condition, communicating it to other processors, allowing them to selectively abort their transactions based on an abort request and condition, optionally using a transaction category scheme to match and abort transactions accordingly, thereby reducing unnecessary processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If fine-grained locking is implemented to improve software scalability, then scalability is improved, but implementation complexity and error-proneness increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware scalabilityVSAvoidimplementation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical locking system with a hardware-based transactional memory system. Instead of using software locks and semaphores that require complex synchronization logic, the invention uses hardware TM to provide automatic atomicity and isolation for memory operations, eliminating the need for fine-grained locking implementation while maintaining scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces hardware transactional memory as an intermediary layer between software applications and the underlying memory system. This hardware TM layer handles conflict detection, transaction management, and abort/retry logic, freeing software from implementing complex locking mechanisms while still achieving fine-grained concurrency control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If hardware interconnect latency is reduced to improve performance, then speed is improved, but physical dimension and speed of light limitations constrain further improvement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinterconnect latencyVSAvoidphysical dimension
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses hardware transactional memory to perform preliminary conflict detection and transaction validation before commits. By detecting conflicts early in the transaction execution and aborting unsuccessfully executing transactions, the system avoids long interconnect transactions that would otherwise be doomed to fail, effectively reducing the time spent on memory operations without requiring faster physical interconnects

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If transactional memory is used to improve atomicity, then reliability is improved, but frequent aborts due to conflicting memory accesses increase time consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveatomicityVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the hardware TM system monitors transaction execution and detects conflicts in real-time. When conflicts are detected, the system provides feedback by aborting the conflicting transaction and allowing it to retry, preventing wasted time on transactions that cannot succeed. This feedback loop optimizes the balance between maintaining atomicity and minimizing time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts the abort decision logic from software and places it in hardware. By having the hardware TM system automatically detect conflicts and trigger aborts, the system eliminates the time software would spend detecting and handling conflicts, reducing overall time consumption while maintaining reliable atomicity guarantees

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Productivity

If more CPU cores are added to increase processing capacity, then productivity is improved, but scalability burden on software increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkload capacityVSAvoidsoftware scalability burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables each CPU core to independently execute transactions with automatic conflict detection and resolution provided by hardware TM. Each core's transactional operations are self-managing, with the hardware automatically handling conflicts without requiring software coordination mechanisms. This self-service capability allows linear scaling with the number of cores, as each core operates independently with minimal software overhead

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10346197B2Inducing transactional aborts in other processing threads
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US10346197B2 patent drawing
  • US10346197B2 patent drawing
  • US10346197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a transactional memory environment, a computer-implemented method includes a first processor initiating a first transaction and encountering an abort condition. Responsive to the abort condition, an abort other request is communicated between the first processor and one or more additional processors. The one or more additional processors receive the abort other request, and, responsive to the abort other request, the one or more additional processors selectively abort a current second transaction based on the abort other request and an abort other condition. Optionally, the transactional memory environment supports a transaction category scheme, whereby each transaction has associated therewith a category identifier. In such embodiments, the abort other request includes an abort category identifier, and the abort other condition includes aborting the current second transaction if the abort category identifier matches the category identifier for the current second transaction. A corresponding computer program product and computer system are also disclosed.