Transactional Memory Deadlock Prediction via Conflict Graph

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lock-based synchronization methods in many-core computer platforms face challenges with overhead and complexity, particularly in converting legacy lock-based instruction constructs to transactional memory constructs, which can lead to deadlocks.

Innovation Solution

A dynamic binary translator is used to convert lock-based instruction constructs into transactional instruction constructs, employing transactional memory to manage concurrency, detect conflicts, and resolve deadlocks by aborting transactions and maintaining a graph to predict and resolve cyclic dependencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If lock-based synchronization is used in many-core computer platforms, then thread coordination is achieved, but synchronization overhead increases and parallel performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethread coordinationVSAvoidsynchronization overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional lock-based mechanical synchronization mechanisms with transactional memory constructs. Instead of using locks that require acquire/release operations and can cause thread blocking, the system uses transactional memory that provides atomicity and isolation through hardware-supported transactional instructions, thereby reducing synchronization overhead while maintaining coordination reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameters of synchronization by transitioning from lock-based mutual exclusion to transaction-based atomicity. This involves changing how concurrency is managed - from preventing simultaneous access through locks to allowing simultaneous access with automatic conflict resolution through transaction commit/abort mechanisms, thereby improving parallel performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Device complexity

If coarse-grained locks are used to protect large segments of data, then the number of locks is reduced, but lock contention increases and parallel throughput decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of locksVSAvoidparallel throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the execution flow into independent transactions that can be executed in parallel. Each transaction represents a discrete unit of work with well-defined memory access patterns, allowing the system to manage concurrency through transaction boundaries rather than through multiple locks. This segmentation enables better parallel throughput while maintaining simplicity in the synchronization mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces transactional memory as an intermediary layer between threads and shared memory. This intermediary provides automatic conflict detection and resolution, allowing multiple transactions to access shared data without requiring traditional lock coordination. The transactional memory system mediates access conflicts through commit/abort semantics, improving parallel throughput while keeping the number of synchronization primitives low

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If fine-grained locks are used to protect small amounts of data, then parallelism is improved, but system complexity increases due to deadlock prevention requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveparallelismVSAvoiddeadlock prevention complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the complex mechanical system of fine-grained lock management with a simpler transactional memory model. Instead of requiring programmers to manually manage multiple fine-grained locks and implement deadlock prevention protocols, the system uses transactional memory constructs that automatically handle concurrency control through atomicity and isolation guarantees, reducing complexity while maintaining high parallelism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements self-service concurrency control through transactional memory. Each transaction independently manages its own execution and conflict resolution without requiring external coordination or complex deadlock prevention mechanisms. The transactional memory system automatically handles conflicts through commit/abort semantics, allowing fine-grained parallelism without the complexity of manual deadlock prevention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If lock-based instruction constructs are converted to transactional memory constructs, then concurrency is exposed and parallel performance is improved, but deadlock may still occur among converted transactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrency exposureVSAvoiddeadlock freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms in the transactional memory system to detect and resolve potential deadlocks. The system monitors transaction execution and conflict patterns, using this feedback to make informed decisions about transaction commit/abort. When conflicts are detected, the system uses feedback from the transaction history and conflict graph to determine which transactions should be aborted to prevent deadlock, thereby maintaining reliability while exposing concurrency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7844946B2Methods and apparatus to form a transactional objective instruction construct from lock-based critical sections
Publication Date: 2010.11.30 INTEL CORP
  • US7844946B2 patent drawing
  • US7844946B2 patent drawing
  • US7844946B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and an apparatus for forming a transaction object instruction construct are provided. An example method translates a source instruction construct to form a transactional objective instruction construct, executes the transactional objective instruction construct, intercepts an aborted transaction associated with the transactional objective instruction construct during execution, maintains a graph of nodes and edges associated with the executed transactional objective instruction construct to predict a deadlock situation, and resolves the deadlock situation associated with the transactional objective instruction construct based on the graph.