Transaxle Power Take-Off Integration for Vehicle Size Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional power take-off (PTO) casings in four-wheel drive vehicles face challenges in standardization and vibration transmission, leading to increased vehicle size and complexity, as well as difficulties in mounting and maintenance due to the need for customized designs to accommodate varying positional relationships between PTO shafts and transaxles.

Innovation Solution

A transaxle design incorporating a power take-off support portion with a shaft hole and an outer side surface shaped to fit a power take-off casing, where the casing is divided into a main and base member, allowing the power take-off shaft to be oriented differently, enabling standardization of the main casing unit and simplifying manufacturing processes, while fasteners are hidden to protect against dust and rain.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the PTO casing is separate from the transaxle and mounted to the vehicle frame, then flexibility in the direction of the power train is improved, but the vehicle size increases and mounting becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in power train directionVSAvoidvehicle size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The PTO casing is integrated with the transaxle housing to form a unified structure. The transaxle housing includes a PTO support portion that directly supports the PTO shaft, eliminating the need for a separate PTO casing mounted to the vehicle frame. This merging reduces vehicle size while maintaining adaptability through the designed PTO support portion geometry.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Adaptability or versatility

If the PTO casing is separate from the transaxle, then flexibility in power train arrangement is improved, but facilitation of mounting is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in power train arrangementVSAvoidfacilitation of mounting
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The PTO casing and transaxle are merged into a single integrated unit. The PTO support portion is formed as an integral part of the transaxle housing, which simplifies mounting operations. The integrated design allows the entire assembly to be mounted as one unit, reducing the number of mounting steps and improving ease of manufacture while maintaining arrangement flexibility through the PTO support portion design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Power

If the PTO shaft transmits power to a separate PTO casing, then power transmission function is achieved, but vibration is transmitted to the vehicle frame

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transmissionVSAvoidvibration transmission
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The PTO support portion is integrated with the transaxle housing, creating a unified structural system. This integration allows the transaxle housing itself to serve as the vibration isolation structure, preventing vibration from being transmitted to the vehicle frame while maintaining effective power transmission from the PTO shaft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the PTO casing is customized to accommodate varying positional relationships, then adaptability to different configurations is improved, but standardization becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to positional variationsVSAvoidstandardization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The transaxle housing includes a specifically designed PTO support portion with optimized local geometry to accommodate varying positional relationships. This localized design approach allows the overall transaxle to be standardized while the PTO support portion provides the necessary adaptability for different configurations through its specific shape and positioning features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

5Ease of manufacture

If the PTO support portion is formed on the transaxle housing, then standardization of the transaxle is improved, but the power take-off shaft orientation flexibility is constrained

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestandardization of transaxleVSAvoidpower take-off shaft orientation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The PTO support portion is designed with specific local geometric features that provide orientation flexibility within the standardized transaxle housing. The support portion includes shaped surfaces and positioning features that enable the PTO shaft to be oriented in different directions while maintaining overall transaxle standardization and ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS7845453B2Transaxle provided with power take-off device
Publication Date: 2010.12.07 KANZAKI KOKYUKOKI MFG
  • US7845453B2 patent drawing
  • US7845453B2 patent drawing
  • US7845453B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A power take-off support portion, including a shaft hole and an outer side surface formed around the shaft hole, is formed on a transaxle housing. The outer side surface of the power take-off support portion is shaped to fit a power take-off casing supporting a power take-off shaft in a first direction. A power take-off casing includes a power take-off main casing member and a base casing member joined to each other. The base casing member is formed with an inner side surface and an outer side surface. The inner side surface and the outer side surface of the base casing member are shaped so that the power take-off shaft supported by the power take-off main casing member is oriented in a second direction different from the first direction when the inner side surface of the base casing member is fitted to the outer side surface of the power take-off support portion, and the outer side surface of the base casing member is fitted to the inner side surface of the power take-off main casing member.