Trainable Transceiver Locking Mechanism for Unauthorized Access Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Transceivers controlling remote electronic devices face security vulnerabilities due to unauthorized access, either physically or remotely, which can lead to malicious operation of these devices.

Innovation Solution

A trainable transceiver with a locking mechanism that enables or disables operations based on multi-factor authentication, comparing a sequence of button inputs to a predetermined sequence and sensor data using image recognition or signal comparison algorithms, ensuring secure operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a locking mechanism with multi-factor authentication is implemented, then security against unauthorized access is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into multiple independent factors: button sequence input, sensor validation (image recognition or signal comparison), and time window verification. Each factor operates as a separate module that contributes to the overall security, allowing the system to maintain high security while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control circuit acts as an intermediary that coordinates between the button input module, sensor validation module, and locking mechanism. This intermediary component manages the authentication flow and decision-making process, centralizing the complexity in a dedicated control unit rather than distributing it across the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multi-factor authentication requiring both button sequence and sensor data is implemented, then unauthorized access prevention is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunauthorized access preventionVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation by checking whether the sensor data matches the predetermined data before final authentication. This preliminary action filters out clearly unauthorized attempts early in the process, and the time window constraint ensures that authentication actions are performed in a reasonable sequence, making the process more intuitive for legitimate users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of time by implementing a time window constraint that validates the temporal relationship between button presses. This adds a dynamic element to authentication that can be adjusted (window size) to balance security and ease of use, allowing legitimate users to complete authentication naturally while preventing rushed or automated attacks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If sensor validation with image recognition or signal comparison algorithms is added, then security against physical access is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against physical accessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sensor module is designed to perform multiple functions: it can capture images for image recognition algorithms or detect signals for signal comparison algorithms. This multi-functional sensor approach allows the system to maintain high security against physical access while avoiding the need for separate dedicated hardware for each authentication method, thereby controlling overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical authentication mechanisms (such as physical keys or switches) with electronic and optical systems including image recognition and signal comparison algorithms. This substitution provides superior security against physical access while integrating these sophisticated functions into a compact electronic form factor, managing the complexity through software-based solutions rather than additional mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20190311609A1Locking mechanisms for enabling or disabling the operations of trainable transceivers
Publication Date: 2019.10.10 GENTEX CORP
  • US20190311609A1 patent drawing
  • US20190311609A1 patent drawing
  • US20190311609A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure is directed to systems and methods of enabling and disabling a functionality of a trainable transceiver. The trainable transceiver may include a plurality of buttons, a control circuit, and a locking mechanism. The plurality of buttons may cause the control circuit to control one or more functions of a remote device. The control circuit may compare a sequence of inputs on the plurality of buttons to a predetermined sequence. The control circuit may acquire a sensor reading and compare the sensor reading to predetermined data. The locking mechanism may enable or disable operation of the control circuit in controlling the one or more functions of the remote device, responsive to a determination that the sequence of inputs matches the predetermined sequence and the sensor reading matches the predetermined data.