Meeting Transcript Post-Processing for Readable Summaries

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems are inadequate in generating accurate and readable summaries from meeting transcripts due to challenges such as heterogeneous semantic styles, lengthy transcripts, and errors in transcription, which affect the efficiency and accuracy of meeting summarization.

Innovation Solution

A computing system that post-processes meeting transcripts using machine learning models to modify punctuation, grammar, and formatting, and attributes content to specific participants, enabling the generation of improved summaries and templates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If abstractive summarization is used to generate more readable summaries, then readability is improved, but system complexity increases due to complicated multi-stage machine learning pipelines

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereadabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the summarization task into distinct components: extractive summarization for identifying key sentences and abstractive summarization for generating paraphrased content. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining readability improvements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges extractive and abstractive summarization approaches into a unified system that leverages the strengths of both methods. By combining sentence extraction with targeted paraphrasing, the system achieves improved readability without requiring entirely complex multi-stage pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Manufacturing precision

If multi-stage machine learning pipelines are used for abstractive summarization, then summarization quality is improved, but training optimization becomes intractable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummarization qualityVSAvoidtraining optimization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary extraction of key sentences and identification of important content before applying abstractive summarization. This preliminary action reduces the input size and complexity for the abstractive model, making training optimization more tractable while maintaining summarization quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies abstractive summarization selectively to specific portions of the transcript rather than the entire text. By focusing computational resources on key sentences and important segments, the system achieves high summarization quality with reduced training complexity compared to processing entire transcripts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Manufacturing precision

If human involvement is increased in template generation, then summary accuracy is improved, but scalability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummary accuracyVSAvoidscalability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the system automatically learns from meeting transcripts and improves its summarization accuracy over time without requiring continuous human intervention. The model performs self-training and adaptation, maintaining high accuracy while enabling scalable deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where summarization outputs are evaluated and used to refine the model. This automated feedback mechanism allows the system to improve accuracy through learning from its own performance data, eliminating the need for extensive human involvement while maintaining scalability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11990132B2Automated meeting minutes generator
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11990132B2 patent drawing
  • US11990132B2 patent drawing
  • US11990132B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A transcription of audio speech included in electronic content associated with a meeting is created by an ASR model trained on speech-to-text data. The transcription is post-processed by modifying text included in the transcription, for example, by modifying punctuation, grammar, or formatting introduced by the ASR model and by changing or omitting one or more words that were included in both the audio speech and the transcription. After the transcription is post-processed, output based on the post-processed transcription is generated in the form of a meeting summary and/or template.