Transducer Fault Detection Using Signal Deviation Time Delay

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional transducer fault detection systems lack detailed analysis of fault indications, often misidentifying noise as legitimate faults and requiring time-intensive manual diagnosis, leading to operational inefficiencies and unnecessary asset trips.

Innovation Solution

A transducer fault detection system that determines fault cases based on the duration of electrical signal deviations from a predetermined operational range, using a fault time delay to differentiate between noise and actual faults, and provides a detailed analysis of possible faults to the operator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional transducer fault detection compares signal to operational range, then fault detection is provided, but noise is misidentified as legitimate faults requiring manual diagnosis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection accuracyVSAvoidmanual diagnosis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by implementing automated fault analysis that evaluates multiple potential fault causes and ranks them before manual intervention is needed. The processor automatically analyzes the electrical signal, determines fault indications, and provides ranked potential causes, eliminating the need for time-intensive manual diagnosis while maintaining accurate fault detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If transducer signal is outside operational range, then fault is indicated, but asset trips occur unnecessarily due to noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault indication accuracyVSAvoidasset operational continuity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by continuously monitoring the electrical signal and comparing it against the operational range, then providing automated analysis of fault indications. When a signal deviation occurs, the processor analyzes multiple potential causes and ranks them, providing feedback that distinguishes actual faults from noise. This prevents unnecessary asset trips while maintaining reliable fault indication through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If detailed fault analysis is implemented, then operational inefficiencies are reduced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidfault detection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by enabling the processor to automatically perform detailed fault analysis, evaluate multiple potential causes, and rank them without requiring additional complex subsystems or manual intervention. The existing processor leverages its computational capabilities to provide comprehensive automated diagnosis, improving operational efficiency while avoiding the need for additional complex hardware or software components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12189461B2Enhanced transducer fault detection
Publication Date: 2025.01.07 BAKER HUGHES CO
  • US12189461B2 patent drawing
  • US12189461B2 patent drawing
  • US12189461B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for enhanced transducer fault detection including receiving data characterizing an electrical signal generated by a transducer, and determining that the received data is outside of a predetermined operational range of the transducer. The method can also include determining a period of time that the received data remains outside of the operational range, and comparing the period of time to a predetermined fault time delay. The method can also include determining that the period of time that the data remains outside of the operational range is greater than or equal to the predetermined fault time delay, and determining that the data is invalid, responsive to determining that the period of time is greater than or equal to the predetermined fault time delay. The method can also include determining a fault case from a plurality of fault cases based on the invalid received data, and providing the determined fault case.