Active Transfer Case Brake Check

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current active transfer cases in four-wheel drive vehicles lack comprehensive malfunction detection for the actuator brake, particularly failing to identify mechanical faults, which can lead to unsafe operational conditions due to limited diagnostic coverage.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating an active brake functionality check within the control system to preemptively assess the actuator brake's functionality, in conjunction with existing passive diagnostics, allowing for early detection and notification of malfunctions before vehicle operation in potentially unsafe situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If passive diagnostics are used for actuator brake monitoring, then the system complexity is low, but the malfunction detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemalfunction detection capabilityVSAvoiddiagnostic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary diagnostic actions by monitoring actuator brake command signals and motor current in advance to detect malfunctions before they lead to unsafe operational conditions. The control system proactively checks for discrepancies between commanded brake application and actual motor response, enabling early fault detection without adding complex dedicated testing hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The diagnostic system establishes feedback loops that continuously monitor the relationship between actuator brake command signals and motor current consumption. By comparing expected current draw during brake application with actual measured current, the system generates feedback about brake functionality, enabling reliable malfunction detection through existing sensor data rather than additional complex diagnostic equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive malfunction detection is implemented, then the reliability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake functionality reliabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it controls normal actuator brake operation, monitors motor current for diagnostic purposes, and detects malfunctions all through the same existing control architecture. The diagnostic functionality is integrated into the existing control logic rather than requiring separate dedicated monitoring systems, allowing one system to serve multiple purposes including control, monitoring, and fault detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses its own existing sensors and control components to perform self-diagnosis. The motor current sensors already present for control purposes are also utilized for diagnostic monitoring, and the control logic itself evaluates its own operational parameters to detect anomalies. This self-service approach enables comprehensive monitoring without requiring external diagnostic equipment or additional complex monitoring infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If active brake check is performed, then the measurement precision of brake status improves, but the use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake status detection accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors motor current during normal operation rather than performing periodic active tests. This continuous monitoring approach maintains precise awareness of brake status throughout operation without requiring additional energy-intensive testing cycles. The diagnostic measurement is integrated into the normal control operation, so the useful action of controlling the actuator brake continues uninterrupted while providing ongoing diagnostic data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses motor current as an intermediary parameter to infer brake status rather than directly measuring brake application force or position. By monitoring the electrical current draw of the motor during brake commands, the system indirectly but precisely determines whether the brake is functioning correctly. This intermediary measurement approach provides accurate diagnostic information using low-power electrical sensing compared to high-power mechanical or hydraulic testing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11274718B2Active brake confirmation for active transfer cases
Publication Date: 2022.03.15 MAGNA POWERTRAIN OF AMERICA INC
  • US11274718B2 patent drawing
  • US11274718B2 patent drawing
  • US11274718B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An active transfer case is equipped with a multi-plate clutch assembly, a clutch actuation mechanism configured to selectively engage the clutch assembly, a power-operated clutch actuator configured to control actuation of the clutch actuation mechanism, a power-operated actuator brake associated with the power-operated clutch actuator, and a control system configured to control actuation of the clutch actuator and the actuator brake while employing a preemptive check of the functionality of the actuator brake.