Transfer Hub Arrival Coordination for Capacity-Constrained Assets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for managing autonomous vehicles in transportation networks face challenges in coordinating the arrival of assets at transfer hubs, leading to inefficiencies and potential overflows due to limited capacity and lack of real-time resource optimization.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that identifies assets arriving at transfer hubs based on attributes and available capacity, determining optimal arrival times to minimize wait times and optimize resource utilization by controlling vehicle speed and routing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If assets are allowed to arrive at transfer hubs without coordination, then the transfer hub can receive assets continuously, but the transfer hub may experience overflow due to limited capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveasset throughputVSAvoidtransfer hub capacity management
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by determining optimal arrival times for assets before they reach the transfer hub. The coordination system calculates and communicates scheduled arrival times that preemptively prevent overflow conditions, ensuring assets arrive when capacity is available rather than reacting to congestion after it occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements dynamic arrival time coordination by adjusting asset schedules based on real-time or predicted transfer hub capacity conditions. Arrival times are not fixed but are dynamically optimized to match available capacity, allowing the system to adapt to varying throughput requirements and capacity constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If assets arrive at transfer hubs without coordinated scheduling, then continuous operation is maintained, but wait times increase due to capacity constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidasset wait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination system performs preliminary scheduling to determine optimal arrival times before assets reach the transfer hub. By pre-calculating arrival schedules that account for capacity constraints, the system eliminates unnecessary waiting time while maintaining continuous operational flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where arrival time determinations are based on capacity information about the transfer hub. This feedback loop allows the coordination system to optimize arrival times that minimize wait periods while ensuring assets arrive when capacity is available, balancing continuous operation with reduced delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If assets arrive at transfer hubs without coordinated scheduling, then operational simplicity is maintained, but energy expenditure increases due to inefficient routing and waiting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling simplicityVSAvoidvehicle energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The coordination system enables assets to self-adjust their arrival times based on received scheduling information. Each asset autonomously modifies its arrival schedule according to the coordination system's directives, eliminating the need for complex real-time negotiation or manual scheduling while reducing energy waste from inefficient routing and waiting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Energy-efficient routing and scheduling are determined in advance by the coordination system before assets begin their journeys. By pre-calculating optimal arrival times and routes that account for transfer hub capacity, the system minimizes energy expenditure from idle waiting and unnecessary route adjustments while maintaining operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12073725B2Systems and methods for coordinating an arrival of one or more assets at a location
Publication Date: 2024.08.27 AURORA OPERATIONS INC
  • US12073725B2 patent drawing
  • US12073725B2 patent drawing
  • US12073725B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one example embodiment, a computer-implemented method for coordinating an arrival of an asset at a location includes identifying one or more assets arriving at a transfer hub, based at least in part on one or more attributes associated with the one or more assets. The method includes determining an arrival time for the one or more assets, based at least in part on an available capacity associated with the transfer hub for receiving the one or more assets. The method includes controlling the one or more assets to arrive at the determined arrival time.