Transfer Learning for Sample Cartridge Defect Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for detecting defects in sample cartridges, such as leaks or inability to maintain internal pressure, are often destructive, inconsistent, and prone to human error, leading to waste and inefficiency in manufacturing.

Innovation Solution

The development of machine learning models using supervised transfer learning and a combination of supervised and unsupervised learning techniques for defect detection, which include training on data sets with expert labels and active learning to identify anomalies, allowing for automated, non-destructive, and accurate identification of defects during manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional seal testing and visual inspection methods are used, then defects can be detected, but the methods are destructive and require scrapping entire lots, causing considerable waste

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection accuracyVSAvoidcartridge waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical and chemical testing methods (seal testing, pressure testing) with optical imaging and machine learning analysis. The system uses images captured during manufacturing to train deep learning models that can predict seal failures without physically testing the cartridges, thereby eliminating the need for destructive testing and lot scrapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs defect prediction during the manufacturing process itself, before the cartridges are completed and packaged. By capturing images at intermediate manufacturing stages and using trained models to identify defects early, the system prevents defective cartridges from proceeding through full manufacturing, thereby avoiding waste of finished products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If extensive seal testing is performed on multiple cartridges to ensure quality, then defective cartridges can be identified, but the entire lot must be scrapped if defects are found

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidmanufacturing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical testing of multiple cartridges with a non-contact optical inspection system. The machine learning models analyze images to predict seal failures with high accuracy, eliminating the need for extensive physical testing of multiple units from each lot and enabling continuous production without interruptions for testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables each cartridge to be individually assessed through image analysis and predictive modeling, rather than requiring group testing. The manufacturing process itself generates the image data needed for inspection, and the system automatically makes pass/fail decisions without human intervention or lot-level scrapping.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If visual inspection methods are used by human operators, then defects can be detected, but the methods are prone to human error and inconsistency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedefect detection consistencyVSAvoidinspection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human visual inspection with automated optical imaging and deep learning analysis. The system captures high-resolution images and uses trained neural networks to identify defects, eliminating human factors such as fatigue, distraction, and varying interpretation criteria. This provides consistent, repeatable inspection results across all cartridges and operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where inspection results are continuously fed back into the manufacturing process. The machine learning models are retrained using actual defect data from the production line, allowing the system to improve its detection accuracy over time and adapt to new defect patterns, thereby continuously enhancing both consistency and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240177288A1Transfer learning methods and models facilitating defect detection
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 CEPHEID INC
  • US20240177288A1 patent drawing
  • US20240177288A1 patent drawing
  • US20240177288A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for training a model for automated defect detection of a product during manufacturing are provided herein. Such methods utilize a combination of supervised transfer learning through auxiliary tasks and a combination of supervised and unsupervised learning. The methods can utilize supervised transfer learning with expert labels on a generalized auxiliary task, such as product classification, which is transferred to more specific auxiliary tasks, such as identification of specific product features and/or anomaly detection, where additional expert labels are then applied to the anomalies, and another iteration of supervised learning further improves the model. The anomalies can correspond to features associated with defects, which can be induced experimentally to improve efficiency of the training procedure. The product can be a sample cartridge such that the model allows detection of faulty cartridges based on sample cartridge and/or manufacturing process data.